Literature DB >> 7838945

The revised standard certificate of live birth: analysis of medical risk factor data from birth certificates in Alabama, 1988-92.

L A Woolbright1, D S Harshbarger.   

Abstract

The latest revision of the birth certificate features a new checkbox format designed to collect more effectively information for public health research. One of the new checkbox items, medical risk factors for this pregnancy, is designed to collect information on risk factors which result in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Data from 308,573 birth certificates filed in Alabama between 1988 and 1992 were analyzed. Although problems exist with the data collected for this item, useful information can be obtained to investigate important public health issues. First, the data can be used to determine the prevalence of medical risk factors in the population. Second, differences between subpopulations with these conditions can be examined. For example, some differences between racial groups in adverse pregnancy outcomes may be explained by the fact that black mothers are more likely to have a medical risk factor than whites. Third, some medical factors are associated with elevated risks for low birth weight, while others are associated with reduced probability of low birth weight. Although useful data can be obtained from the medical risk factor item, it and other checkbox items would be more useful if efforts were made to improve reporting. Improvements in training persons who complete the birth certificate are especially needed. Reporting of checkbox items also needs to be validated by comparing results with other sources. In future revisions of the birth certificate, new items need to be examined carefully to determine if that instrument is the appropriate medium for collecting the information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7838945      PMCID: PMC1382075     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  2 in total

1.  The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina.

Authors:  P A Buescher; K P Taylor; M H Davis; J M Bowling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Birth complication reporting: the effect of birth certificate design.

Authors:  F Frost; P Starzyk; S George; J F McLaughlin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 9.308

  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  The validity of information on "race" and "Hispanic ethnicity" in California birth certificate data.

Authors:  L Baumeister; K Marchi; M Pearl; R Williams; P Braveman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.

Authors:  Kenneth C Johnson; Betty-Anne Daviss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-18

3.  Adolescent pregnancy and gestational weight gain: do the Institute of Medicine recommendations apply?

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Jen Jen Chang; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Risk of prematurity and infant morbidity and mortality by maternal fertility status and plurality.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; David B Seifer; Amy T Sparks; Paul C Lin; Kevin J Doody; Bradley J Van Voorhis; Logan G Spector
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  S A Dobie; L M Baldwin; R A Rosenblatt; M A Fordyce; C H Andrilla; L G Hart
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

6.  Understanding maternal smoking during pregnancy: does residential context matter?

Authors:  Carla Shoff; Tse-Chuan Yang
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Perinatal and infant health among rural and urban American Indians/Alaska Natives.

Authors:  Laura-Mae Baldwin; David C Grossman; Susan Casey; Walter Hollow; Jonathan R Sugarman; William L Freeman; L Gary Hart
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.308

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.