Literature DB >> 7838928

Mesoaccumbens dopamine-opiate interactions in the control over behaviour by a conditioned reinforcer.

G D Phillips1, T W Robbins, B J Everitt.   

Abstract

These experiments examined the role of dopamine-opiate interactions in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and nucleus accumbens in the mediation of reinforcement-related behaviour. It has been shown previously that opiates induce a dopamine-dependent increase in locomotor activity in rats when infused into the VTA, and a dopamine-independent hyperactivity when infused into the nucleus accumbens. The present study investigated the generality and significance of these two findings, by examining dopamine-opiate interactions in the control over behaviour exerted by a conditioned reinforcer (CR), an arbitrary stimulus which gains control by association with primary reinforcement. Rats were trained to associate a light/noise stimulus with sucrose reinforcement, and the efficacy of the CR in controlling behaviour was assessed by measuring its ability to support a new lever pressing response. Responding on one lever (CR lever) produced the CR, responding on the other lever had no programmed consequences. In experiment 1, intra-accumbens infusions of d-amphetamine (10 micrograms), the D1 dopamine receptor agonist SKF-38393 (0.1 microgram), the D2 dopamine receptor agonist LY-171555 (quinpirole; 0.1 microgram) or the opiate receptor agonist [D-Ala2]-methionine enkephalinamide (DALA; 1 microgram) selectively increased responding on the CR lever. Infusion with DALA intra-VTA had no effect. However, pretreatment with DALA intra-VTA (10 x 1 microgram/day) subsequently reduced the selectivity of the response to infusions intra-accumbens with d-amphetamine or SKF-38393, and blocked the response to LY-171555 or DALA. Pretreatment also shifted to the right the dose-response function for DALA intra-accumbens. In experiment 2, intra-accumbens infusions of d-amphetamine, SKF-38393, LY-171555 or DALA again increased responding on the CR lever only. Pretreatment with intra-accumbens d-amphetamine (5 x 1 microgram/day) reduced the selectivity of the response subsequently to d-amphetamine, and blocked the response to SKF-38393, LY-171555 or DALA. In experiment 3, intra-accumbens infusions of the mu-opiate receptor agonist [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (0.003-0.1 microgram), or the delta-opiate receptor agonist [D-Pen2,5]-enkephalin (0.03-1 microgram) enhanced selectively responding on the CR lever. Thus, the dopamine-dependent locomotor-stimulant properties of intra-VTA infusions of opiates are associated with impaired conditioned reinforcer efficacy. Finally, repeated stimulation of the mesoaccumbens dopamine pathway may compromise the dopamine-independence of the opiate system within the nucleus accumbens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7838928     DOI: 10.1007/bf02244858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  85 in total

1.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Enkephalin modulation of A10 dopamine neurons: a role in dopamine sensitization.

Authors:  P W Kalivas; P Duffy; R Dilts; R Abhold
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Stimulant effects of enkephalin microinjection into the dopaminergic A10 area.

Authors:  C L Broekkamp; A G Phillips; A R Cools
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-04-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Sensitization occurs to the locomotor effects of morphine and the specific mu opioid receptor agonist, DAGO, administered repeatedly to the ventral tegmental area but not to the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  P Vezina; P W Kalivas; J Stewart
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1987-08-04       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Autoradiographic localization of mu-opioid and neurotensin receptors within the mesolimbic dopamine system.

Authors:  R P Dilts; P W Kalivas
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1989-05-29       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Voltammetric evidence that subsensitivity to reward following chronic mild stress is associated with increased release of mesolimbic dopamine.

Authors:  J A Stamford; R Muscat; J J O'Connor; J Patel; S J Trout; W J Wieczorek; Z L Kruk; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Cross-sensitization between foot shock stress and enkephalin-induced motor activity.

Authors:  P W Kalivas; R Richardson-Carlson; G Van Orden
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Time course of extracellular dopamine and behavioral sensitization to cocaine. I. Dopamine axon terminals.

Authors:  P W Kalivas; P Duffy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Limbic-striatal interactions in reward-related processes.

Authors:  T W Robbins; M Cador; J R Taylor; B J Everitt
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1989 Summer-Fall       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Analogues of beta-LPH61-64 possessing selective agonist activity at mu-opiate receptors.

Authors:  B K Handa; A C Land; J A Lord; B A Morgan; M J Rance; C F Smith
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1981-04-09       Impact factor: 4.432

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Discrete neurochemical coding of distinguishable motivational processes: insights from nucleus accumbens control of feeding.

Authors:  Brian A Baldo; Ann E Kelley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Analysis of the effects of intra-accumbens SKF-38393 and LY-171555 upon the behavioural satiety sequence.

Authors:  G D Phillips; S R Howes; R B Whitelaw; T W Robbins; B J Everitt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Bilateral intra-accumbens self-administration of d-amphetamine: antagonism with intra-accumbens SCH-23390 and sulpiride.

Authors:  G D Phillips; T W Robbins; B J Everitt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Isolation rearing impairs the reinforcing efficacy of intravenous cocaine or intra-accumbens d-amphetamine: impaired response to intra-accumbens D1 and D2/D3 dopamine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  G D Phillips; S R Howes; R B Whitelaw; T W Robbins; B J Everitt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Intra-accumbens amphetamine increases the conditioned incentive salience of sucrose reward: enhancement of reward "wanting" without enhanced "liking" or response reinforcement.

Authors:  C L Wyvell; K C Berridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Bupropion and nicotine enhance responding for nondrug reinforcers via dissociable pharmacological mechanisms in rats.

Authors:  Matthew I Palmatier; Melissa E Levin; Kara L Mays; Eric C Donny; Anthony R Caggiula; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Repeated nicotine exposure enhances responding with conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  Peter Olausson; J David Jentsch; Jane R Taylor
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Agents in development for the management of cocaine abuse.

Authors:  David A Gorelick; Eliot L Gardner; Zheng-Xiong Xi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Nicotine enhances responding with conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  Peter Olausson; J David Jentsch; Jane R Taylor
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.