Literature DB >> 7838123

Functional effects of mutations in the putative agonist binding region of recombinant alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors.

F Li1, N Owens, T A Verdoorn.   

Abstract

Structural correlates of ligand binding to alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl- 4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors were examined by altering conserved lysine residues to either glutamate or glutamate at position 445 of the GluR-A subunit and position 449 of the GluR-B subunit. Receptors were expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and in Xenopus oocytes as homomeric GluR-A or heteromeric combinations of GluR-A/B. The functional properties of the resulting receptors were measured with patch-clamp and voltage-clamp electrophysiology. These mutations, which reduced the total positive charge at the lysine 445 position, selectively altered the affinity of some ligands and had no obvious effect on receptor desensitization properties. The L-glutamate EC50 was 10.2 microM when wild-type GluR-A was coexpressed with GluR-B (GluR-A/B) and 38.9 microM when GluR-A445Q/B449Q receptors were tested. The AMPA EC50 was similarly reduced (wild-type, 3.71 microM; GluR-A445Q/B449Q, 21.4 microM). Receptors containing a glutamate residue at this position were even less sensitive to L-glutamate and AMPA. Whereas the apparent potency of L-glutamate varied inversely with the total positive charge regardless of the subunit, the affinity of AMPA was more sensitive to mutations in GluR-A than to those in GluR-B. Interestingly, the EC50 of kainate was unaffected by most of these mutations and actually increased slightly with GluR-A445E/B449E receptors. The affinity of 6-cyano-2,3-dihydroxy-7- nitroquinoxaline (CNQX) was slightly reduced with GluR-A445E/B449E receptors, whereas the apparent affinity of GYKI52466 was unchanged. These data confirm that structural correlates of binding to AMPA receptors vary among different ligands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7838123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  8 in total

1.  Identification of amino acid residues in GluR1 responsible for ligand binding and desensitization.

Authors:  T G Banke; J R Greenwood; J K Christensen; T Liljefors; S F Traynelis; A Schousboe; D S Pickering
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Three-dimensional models of non-NMDA glutamate receptors.

Authors:  M J Sutcliffe; Z G Wo; R E Oswald
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Characterization of the kainate-binding domain of the glutamate receptor GluR-6 subunit.

Authors:  K Keinänen; A Jouppila; A Kuusinen
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Overexpression of a glutamate receptor (GluR2) ligand binding domain in Escherichia coli: application of a novel protein folding screen.

Authors:  G Q Chen; E Gouaux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  AMPA receptors and bacterial periplasmic amino acid-binding proteins share the ionic mechanism of ligand recognition.

Authors:  M Lampinen; O Pentikäinen; M S Johnson; K Keinänen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-08-17       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Factors affecting guanine nucleotide binding to rat AMPA receptors.

Authors:  Kyle Montgomery; Erika Suzuki; Markus Kessler; Amy C Arai
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Identification of an extracellular motif involved in the binding of guanine nucleotides by a glutamate receptor.

Authors:  Y Paas; A Devillers-Thiéry; J P Changeux; F Medevielle; V I Teichberg
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Extracellular glutamate: functional compartments operate in different concentration ranges.

Authors:  Khaled Moussawi; Arthur Riegel; Satish Nair; Peter W Kalivas
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.