Literature DB >> 7836523

Factors influencing the outcome of in-vitro fertilization with epididymal spermatozoa in irreversible obstructive azoospermia.

A V Hirsh1, C Mills, J Bekir, N Dean, J L Yovich, S L Tan.   

Abstract

Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) were found to offer limited opportunity for fatherhood to 45 men with obstructive azoospermia, due principally to poor embryo implantation. Adequate sperm preparations were obtained in 46/50 treatment cycles (92%), with the best motility found in the caput epididymis in 89% of cases. The mean fertilization rate was 11.2% and fertilization occurred in 23 cycles (50%), with embryo transfer arising from 12/26 men with vas aplasia (CAV), 4/9 with genital tract obstruction (EV) and 7/11 with irreversible vasectomy (VV). The overall implantation rate was low, 8.7% per embryo transfer (11.7% per 2-3 embryo transfers) and was not improved by Fallopian transfer. There were two pregnancies (4% per cycle), both in the EV group where embryo formation and implantation (2/4, 50% per cycle) were optimum even though sperm preparations were paradoxically inferior to the CAV and VV groups. The spermatozoa retrieved in the two successful EV cycles were appreciably blood contaminated. Analysis of the 21 failed embryo transfers showed delayed fertilization in 10 cycles, cystic fibrosis (CF) mutation or familial disease in 7/12 CAV men and the VV men were older (P < 0.001). A pregnancy which miscarried arose from a case of Young's syndrome, a carrier of CF mutation DF508. Male factors could thus be implicated in the high embryo wastage of MESA cycles and might also be influencing implantation in other IVF procedures. Where feasible, male reconstructive surgery is preferable unless fertilization can be improved, possibly by speedier retrieval techniques or by permitting sperm capacitation in vitro, but probably more effectively by micro-assisted insemination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7836523     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgery for male subfertility.

Authors:  Y Khalifa; J G Grudzinskas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-06

2.  The outcome of sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with obstructive azoospermia: impact of previous tuberculous epididymitis.

Authors:  S Y Moon; S H Kim; B C Jee; B J Jung; C S Suh; J Y Lee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Integrating surgical and clinical andrology is essential to improve the quality of care delivered to infertile couples.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ahmad Majzoub; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

4.  Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration and short time insemination in the treatment of men with obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Yan Jiang; Qinying Cao; Xiujun Zhao; Li Li; Shuxian Li; Fulu Gao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Factors impacting couples' decision-making between vasectomy reversal versus sperm retrieval/in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  P K Kavoussi; K M Kavoussi; K C Odenwald; S K Kavoussi
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.842

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.