Literature DB >> 7834592

The psychometric properties of the Competency Interview Schedule.

G Bean1, S Nishisato, N A Rector, G Glancy.   

Abstract

One of the most contentious issues in medical and legal practice is how to reliably assess the mental competence of individuals who consent or refuse psychiatric treatment. Current legislation does not provide clear definitions of what constitutes competence or incompetence to make a treatment decision. As a preliminary attempt to operationalize the concept of competency, we have developed a 15 item questionnaire. The present study reports on the psychometric properties of the instrument. Test-retest and interrater reliability results were good. The instrument was internally consistent and discriminated between individuals found competent and incompetent by the treating physician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7834592     DOI: 10.1177/070674379403900804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0706-7437            Impact factor:   4.356


  10 in total

Review 1.  Neuropsychological assessment of mental capacity.

Authors:  Karen Sullivan
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment.

Authors:  E Etchells; P Darzins; M Silberfeld; P A Singer; J McKenny; G Naglie; M Katz; G H Guyatt; D W Molloy; D Strang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Assessment of Healthcare Decision-making Capacity.

Authors:  Barton W Palmer; Alexandrea L Harmell
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.813

Review 4.  Competency to consent to treatment.

Authors:  M E Pollack; S B Billick
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  1999

Review 5.  Bioethics for clinicians: 3. Capacity.

Authors:  E Etchells; G Sharpe; C Elliott; P A Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  The U-ARE Protocol: A Pragmatic Approach to Decisional Capacity Assessment for Clinical Research.

Authors:  Rachel K B Hamilton; Cynthia H Phelan; Nathaniel A Chin; Mary F Wyman; Nickolas Lambrou; Nichelle Cobb; Amy J H Kind; Hanna Blazel; Sanjay Asthana; Carey E Gleason
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

7.  Assessment of Capacity to Consent to Treatment: Challenges, the "ACCT" Approach, Future Directions.

Authors:  Jennifer Moye; Michele J Karel; Barry Edelstein; Bret Hicken; Jorge C Armesto; Ronald J Gurrera
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 2.619

8.  Unreasonable reasons: normative judgements in the assessment of mental capacity.

Authors:  Natalie F Banner
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  Developing a Tool to Assess Competency to Consent to Psychiatric Hospitalization (KATOC): Reliability and Validity.

Authors:  Mi Kyung Seo; Seung Hyun Kim; Minkyu Rhee
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 10.  Depression and decision-making capacity for treatment or research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Hindmarch; Matthew Hotopf; Gareth S Owen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.652

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.