Literature DB >> 7834063

Treatment of delayed unions and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal with pulsed electromagnetic fields.

G B Holmes1.   

Abstract

Nine delayed unions and nonunion of the proximal fifth metatarsal were treated with pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF). All fractures healed in a mean time of 4 months (range 2-8 months). Those fractures treated with both pulsed electromagnetic fields and a nonweightbearing cast healed in a mean time of 3 months (range 2-4 months). The average duration of follow-up was 39 months (range 24-60 months). There were no refractures. When compared with reported healing times and morbidity for conventional casting, medullary curettage with inlay bone, and closed axial intramedullary screw fixation, pulsed electromagnetic fields provided an effective alternative for the treatment of delayed unions and nonunion of the proximal fifth metatarsal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7834063     DOI: 10.1177/107110079401501006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  10 in total

Review 1.  Zone II and III fifth metatarsal fractures in athletes.

Authors:  Michael Le; Robert Anderson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of cervical osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

Authors:  Serap Tomruk Sutbeyaz; Nebahat Sezer; Belma Fusun Koseoglu
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 4.  Stress fracture of the fourth metatarsal in a child: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Samer Morgan; Ravindra Gudena; Ernest Schilders
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-11-10

5.  Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulates cellular proliferation in human intervertebral disc cells.

Authors:  Hwan-Mo Lee; Un-Hye Kwon; Hyang Kim; Ho-Joong Kim; Boram Kim; Jin-Oh Park; Eun-Soo Moon; Seong-Hwan Moon
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-07-26

7.  Systemic treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields do not affect bone microarchitecture in osteoporotic rats.

Authors:  Olav P van der Jagt; Jacqueline C van der Linden; Jan H Waarsing; Jan A N Verhaar; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: Anatomy, Classification, Treatment and Complications.

Authors:  Chi Nok Cheung; Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  Arch Trauma Res       Date:  2016-06-13

Review 9.  Fifth metatarsal fractures: an update on management, complications, and outcomes.

Authors:  George D Chloros; Christos D Kakos; Ioannis K Tastsidis; Vasileios P Giannoudis; Michalis Panteli; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-01-11

10.  Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats.

Authors:  O P van der Jagt; J C van der Linden; J H Waarsing; J A N Verhaar; H Weinans
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.853

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.