Literature DB >> 7832828

Laboratory blunders revisited.

R Lapworth1, T K Teal.   

Abstract

Blunders which occurred over a 1 year period in the clinical chemistry departments of two health districts were recorded and categorized according to type and detection stage. A blunder was defined as an incident leading to an incorrect result/set of results either being reported or detected at the final checking-out stage in the laboratory. Of the total of 120 blunders--which is a blunder rate of less than 0.1% of requests--53 (44%) were detected at the final checking-out stage. Blunders detected after the report had left the laboratory were divided into those subsequently picked up by laboratory personnel (23); those detected by clinicians (19); and those by external quality assessment schemes (21). The types of blunder were fairly equally distributed between the booking-in (36), analysis (38), and reporting (35) stages of the laboratory process. A formal review of blunders detected in laboratories is a valuable aid to overall performance.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7832828     DOI: 10.1177/000456329403100113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  2 in total

1.  Clinical impact associated with corrected results in clinical microbiology testing.

Authors:  Shan Yuan; Michael L Astion; Jeff Schapiro; Ajit P Limaye
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase?

Authors:  Gunn B B Kristensen; Kristin Moberg Aakre; Ann Helen Kristoffersen; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.