Literature DB >> 7831140

Evaluation of two dosages of oral midazolam as a conscious sedation for physically and neurologically compromised pediatric dental patients.

T Silver1, C Wilson, M Webb.   

Abstract

Physically and neurologically handicapped pediatric dental patients are often a challenge to treat and may require the use of pharmacological agents for behavior modification. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety, in terms of vital sign changes and complications, and the effectiveness, in terms of behavioral changes, of two dosages of oral midazolam as a conscious sedative agent for this unique population. Participating in this study were 31 patients of Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, who were uncooperative (as rated on the Frankl scale) at a previous dental appointment. The patients, 3-18 years old, were randomly selected to receive one of the two dosage regimens; Group A received 0.3 mg/kg oral midazolam and Group B received 0.5 mg/kg. Physiologic parameters and behavior were recorded throughout the appointment and overall safety and success were determined. Although clinically insignificant, Group A's pulse rates 20 min into treatment were significantly higher than at baseline or treatment start, and oxygen saturations were lower during treatment than at baseline and start of treatment. Intratreatment systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulse rates of Group B were significantly higher than the baseline figures; however, these changes were not clinically significant. No clinical or postoperative complications were noted for either dosage. The regimen of 0.3 mg/kg of oral midazolam was successful 75% of the time, and the regimen of 0.5 mg/kg of oral midazolam was successful 60% of the time in providing adequate sedation to allow operative treatment to be safely and efficiently performed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7831140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  10 in total

1.  A prospective study of 2 sedation regimens in children: chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine versus midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine.

Authors:  Marianne M Sheroan; Diane C Dilley; Warner J Lucas; William F Vann
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

2.  A randomized clinical trial comparing oral, aerosolized intranasal, and aerosolized buccal midazolam.

Authors:  Eileen J Klein; Julie C Brown; Ana Kobayashi; Daniel Osincup; Kristy Seidel
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment.

Authors:  Paul F Ashley; Mohsin Chaudhary; Liege Lourenço-Matharu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-17

4.  Conscious Sedation Efficacy of 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg Oral Midazolam for Three to Six Year-Old Uncooperative Children Undergoing Dental Treatment: A Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Masoud Fallahinejad Ghajari; Ghassem Ansari; Leila Hasanbeygi; Shahnaz Shayeghi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-03

5.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Sedative Effects of Nitrous Oxide-oxygen Inhalation and Oral Midazolam-Ketamine Combination in Children.

Authors:  Jyothsna V Setty; Priya Mendiretta
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2018-10-01

6.  Efficacy of oral midazolam for minimal and moderate sedation in pediatric patients: A systematic review.

Authors:  Maria A Manso; Catherine Guittet; François Vandenhende; Luc-André Granier
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.556

7.  Conscious sedation procedures using intravenous midazolam for dental care in patients with different cognitive profiles: a prospective study of effectiveness and safety.

Authors:  Valérie Collado; Denise Faulks; Emmanuel Nicolas; Martine Hennequin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Saeed Majidinejad; Keramat Taherian; Mehrdad Esmailian; Mehdi Khazaei; Vajihe Samaie
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2015

9.  Efficacy of oral ketamine compared to midazolam for sedation of children undergoing laceration repair: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Orit Rubinstein; Shiri Barkan; Rachelle Breitbart; Sofia Berkovitch; Michal Toledano; Giora Weiser; Natali Karadi; Anat Nassi; Eran Kozer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  A Retrospective Review of a Bed-mounted Projection System for Managing Pediatric Preoperative Anxiety.

Authors:  Thomas J Caruso; Jeremy H Tsui; Ellen Wang; David Scheinker; Paul J Sharek; Christine Cunningham; Samuel T Rodriguez
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2018-06-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.