Literature DB >> 7830982

Readability of subject information leaflets for medical research.

J Murphy1, G Gamble, N Sharpe.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the readability of adult subject information leaflets prepared for medical research projects with the readability scores of a range of New Zealand newspaper editorials and popular magazine articles.
METHODS: Of the 134 research projects approved by the Auckland Area Health Board in 1991, 99 were analysed together with nine randomly selected newspaper editorials and nine randomly selected articles from popular magazines. The Flesch reading ease index, the Flesch-Kincaid index and the Gunning fog index were calculated using a computerised grammar checker.
RESULTS: Subject information leaflets were easier to read than newspaper editorials but significantly more difficult to read than articles in popular magazines. The Flesch reading ease index showed that information leaflets had a median readability score of 53 compared with magazines which had a score of 67 and newspaper editorials which had a score of 48. The level of secondary school education required to read information leaflets was equivalent to about 2 years or form 4, whereas a level of about form 5 appears to be required to read newspaper editorials and a level of about form 1 for magazine articles.
CONCLUSIONS: The readability level of information leaflets prepared for participants in medical research in the Auckland area appears satisfactory and the process for reviewing this component of the research protocol appears consistent and effective. Readability scores may be a useful tool in assessing the overall ease with which written information can be read.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7830982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  8 in total

1.  Relation of health literacy to gonorrhoea related care.

Authors:  J D Fortenberry; M M McFarlane; M Hennessy; S S Bull; D M Grimley; J St Lawrence; B P Stoner; N VanDevanter
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 2.  Issues in patient compliance.

Authors:  J Murphy; G Coster
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Patients' perceptions of information provided in clinical trials.

Authors:  P R Ferguson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Lydia O'Sullivan; Prasanth Sukumar; Rachel Crowley; Eilish McAuliffe; Peter Doran
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Prescription painkillers and controlled substances: an appraisal of drug information provided by six US pharmacies.

Authors:  Preetinder S Gill
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2013-02-25

6.  Readability assessment of concussion and traumatic brain injury publications by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Preetinder S Gill; Tejkaran S Gill; Ashwini Kamath; Billy Whisnant
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-11-07

7.  Continuing review of ethics in clinical trials: a surveillance study in Iran.

Authors:  Fariba Asghari; Seyedeh Mojgan Ghalandarpoorattar
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2013-09-08

8.  Development and Evaluation of Patient Information Leaflet for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients.

Authors:  Sonal Sekhar M; Unnikrishnan Mk; Navya Vyas; Gabriel Sunil Rodrigues
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-06-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.