Literature DB >> 7827233

The use of a new bioresorbable barrier for guided bone regeneration in connection with implant installation. Case reports.

D Lundgren1, L Sennerby, H Falk, B Friberg, S Nyman.   

Abstract

This report presents 4 cases with 6 implant exposures after the installation of Brånemark System implants which called for treatment applying the guided bone regeneration technique. A bioresorbable barrier (GUIDOR Matrix Barrier) was used to cover the defects, 4 defects with and 2 without the support of autologous bone chips. Complete bone filling was found in 4 (2 without and 2 with bone chips) and partial filling in 2 (with bone chips) of the treated defects, as registered at the abutment connection 6-7 months after surgery. Besides its ability to serve as a barrier for guided bone regeneration, it was found that the matrix barrier had the following properties; biocompatibility observed as uneventful tissue healing, malleability facilitating the clinical handling and ability to be resorbed within 6 to 7 months, as evaluated by clinical inspection. The observations of the present case reports indicate that the tested barrier may be used for guided bone regeneration in connection with implant installation. It is advisable, however, to use a supporting material to prevent barrier collapse, although bone regeneration can be achieved in certain situations without such material if the defect morphology is favourable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7827233     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050309.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  6 in total

Review 1.  Collagen based barrier membranes for periodontal guided bone regeneration applications.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Javairia Qureshi; Abdullah M Alshahrani; Heba Nassar; Yuichi Ikeda; Michael Glogauer; Bernhard Ganss
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Plain and drug loaded polyphosphazene membranes and microspheres in the treatment of rabbit bone defects.

Authors:  P Passi; A Zadro; F Marsilio; S Lora; P Caliceti; F M Veronese
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study.

Authors:  Mehmet A Eskan; Marie-Eve Girouard; Dean Morton; Henry Greenwell
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-06-22

Review 4.  Natural graft tissues and synthetic biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive applications: a review.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Nader Hamdan; Yuichi Ikeda; Marc Grynpas; Bernhard Ganss; Michael Glogauer
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2017-06-05

5.  Silver Nanoparticles Coated Poly(L-Lactide) Electrospun Membrane for Implant Associated Infections Prevention.

Authors:  Jiaolong Wang; Lilin Zhan; Xianhua Zhang; Runfa Wu; Lan Liao; Junchao Wei
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Seong-Gon Kim; Min-Keun Kim; HaeYong Kweon; You-Young Jo; Kwang-Gill Lee; Jeong Keun Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-02-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.