Literature DB >> 7827103

Comparative kinetic study of lipases A and B from Candida rugosa in the hydrolysis of lipid p-nitrophenyl esters in mixed micelles with Triton X-100.

O Redondo1, A Herrero, J F Bello, M G Roig, M V Calvo, F J Plou, F J Burguillo.   

Abstract

(1) Lipases A and B from Candida rugosa catalyzing the hydrolysis of esters in micellar media have been characterized kinetically by studies on substrate specificity, rate equation forms and modeling of enzyme mechanisms. (2) The study on specificity revealed that both lipases are non-specific esterases with similar activity against lipid p-nitrophenyl esters micellized with Triton X-100. The slight difference was that lipase A has its maximum activity centered in the caprylate while that of lipase B is in the laurate. (3) Kinetic studies for both lipases were carried out with p-nitrophenyl laurate under three experimental conditions: (I) the molar fraction of substrate is fixed and the bulk concentration of substrate and Triton X-100 are varied; (II) the bulk concentration of substrate is held constant and the molar fraction of substrate and bulk concentration of Triton X-100 are varied; and (III) the bulk concentration of Triton X-100 is held constant but the bulk concentration of substrate and molar fraction of substrate are varied. (4) In case I, a similar Michaelis-Menten behaviour was observed with both lipases; the curve fitting gave kappcat/Kappm values of 3.0.10(5) and 5.6.10(5) s-1 M-1 for lipases A and B respectively. In case II, for both lipases the relationship between rate and the molar fraction of substrate required a fitting equation of 2:2 degree polynomial quotient. In case III, both lipases showed non-Michaelian behaviour with concave-up curves in the Eadie-Hofstee plot, a minimum degree of 2:2 in substrate concentration being detected for the rate equation. (5) The above results are interpreted in terms of the hypothesis that the mechanism of both lipases must include at least two different inputs for the molecule of substrate which would explain the quadratic terms observed in the rate equation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7827103     DOI: 10.1016/0304-4165(94)00112-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  6 in total

1.  Lipolytic enzymes in Myxococcus xanthus.

Authors:  Aurelio Moraleda-Muñoz; Lawrence J Shimkets
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Multiple mutagenesis of non-universal serine codons of the Candida rugosa LIP2 gene and biochemical characterization of purified recombinant LIP2 lipase overexpressed in Pichia pastoris.

Authors:  Guan-Chiun Lee; Li-Chiun Lee; Vasyl Sava; Jei-Fu Shaw
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Lipase-Secreting Bacillus Species in an Oil-Contaminated Habitat: Promising Strains to Alleviate Oil Pollution.

Authors:  Li Pin Lee; Hudzaifah Mohamed Karbul; Marimuthu Citartan; Subash C B Gopinath; Thangavel Lakshmipriya; Thean-Hock Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  A fast, miniaturised in-vitro assay developed for quantification of lipase enzyme activity.

Authors:  Ariane Menden; Davane Hall; Daniel Paris; Venkatarian Mathura; Fiona Crawford; Michael Mullan; Stefan Crynen; Ghania Ait-Ghezala
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.051

Review 5.  Strategies to characterize fungal lipases for applications in medicine and dairy industry.

Authors:  Subash C B Gopinath; Periasamy Anbu; Thangavel Lakshmipriya; Azariah Hilda
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Comparative Structural Analysis of Different Mycobacteriophage-Derived Mycolylarabinogalactan Esterases (Lysin B).

Authors:  Ahmed H Korany; Adel Abouhmad; Walid Bakeer; Tamer Essam; Magdy A Amin; Rajni Hatti-Kaul; Tarek Dishisha
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-12-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.