OBJECTIVE: To compare the cardiovascular, pulmonary, and ocular hypotensive effects of 0.2% brimonidine tartrate with those of 0.5% timolol maleate, 0.25% betaxolol suspension, and brimonidine vehicle. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A single-center, double-masked, randomized, crossover study of 24 young, healthy men. INTERVENTIONS:Baseline heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and intraocular pressure were recorded at hour 0. At hour 2, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were measured and a 15-minute treadmill test performed. Hour 0 measurements were repeated at hour 4. On four subsequent visits, we instilled one drop of a study medication into each eye after the baseline measurements at hour 0. RESULTS:Timolol reduced resting (-5.3 to -6.5 beats/min, P < or = .004) and exercise-induced heart rate (-4.3 to -13.6 beats/min; P < or = .022) compared with brimonidine, betaxolol suspension, and brimonidine vehicle. At hour 4, brimonidine reduced resting systolic blood pressure compared with all other study medications (-5.2 to -7.3 mm Hg; P < or = .024). Timolol reduced systolic blood pressure during exercise and brimonidine reduced systolic blood pressure during recovery more than betaxolol suspension and brimonidine vehicle (-5.1 to -7.7 mm Hg; P < or = .033; and -5.4 to -6.0 mm Hg; P < or = .002, respectively). Mean respiratory rate and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were not significantly altered by any study medication. At hour 4, brimonidine lowered intraocular pressure as well as timolol and better than betaxolol suspension (-1.9 mm Hg; P < .001) or brimonidine vehicle (-1.8 mm Hg; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The cardiopulmonary effects of 0.2% brimonidine were limited to a slight reduction in systolic blood pressure during recovery from exercise and at 4 hours after instillation. The ocular hypotensive effect of brimonidine was comparable to that of timolol and greater than that of betaxolol suspension in this patient population.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the cardiovascular, pulmonary, and ocular hypotensive effects of 0.2% brimonidine tartrate with those of 0.5% timolol maleate, 0.25% betaxolol suspension, and brimonidine vehicle. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A single-center, double-masked, randomized, crossover study of 24 young, healthy men. INTERVENTIONS: Baseline heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and intraocular pressure were recorded at hour 0. At hour 2, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were measured and a 15-minute treadmill test performed. Hour 0 measurements were repeated at hour 4. On four subsequent visits, we instilled one drop of a study medication into each eye after the baseline measurements at hour 0. RESULTS:Timolol reduced resting (-5.3 to -6.5 beats/min, P < or = .004) and exercise-induced heart rate (-4.3 to -13.6 beats/min; P < or = .022) compared with brimonidine, betaxolol suspension, and brimonidine vehicle. At hour 4, brimonidine reduced resting systolic blood pressure compared with all other study medications (-5.2 to -7.3 mm Hg; P < or = .024). Timolol reduced systolic blood pressure during exercise and brimonidine reduced systolic blood pressure during recovery more than betaxolol suspension and brimonidine vehicle (-5.1 to -7.7 mm Hg; P < or = .033; and -5.4 to -6.0 mm Hg; P < or = .002, respectively). Mean respiratory rate and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were not significantly altered by any study medication. At hour 4, brimonidine lowered intraocular pressure as well as timolol and better than betaxolol suspension (-1.9 mm Hg; P < .001) or brimonidine vehicle (-1.8 mm Hg; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The cardiopulmonary effects of 0.2% brimonidine were limited to a slight reduction in systolic blood pressure during recovery from exercise and at 4 hours after instillation. The ocular hypotensive effect of brimonidine was comparable to that of timolol and greater than that of betaxolol suspension in this patient population.
Authors: Clara C Cousins; Jonathan C Chou; Scott H Greenstein; Stacey C Brauner; Lucy Q Shen; Angela V Turalba; Patricia Houlihan; Robert Ritch; Janey L Wiggs; Paul A Knepper; Louis R Pasquale Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 4.638