Literature DB >> 7825041

Effect of discharge recommendations on outcome.

H Hall1, G McIntosh, T Melles, B Holowachuk, E Wai.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The incidence of two common discharge recommendations, return to work unrestricted (RTWU) and restricted (RTWR) suggested that most restrictions were applied on the basis of patients' subjective reports of pain or therapists' unfounded fears that return to full duty would result in physical harm.
OBJECTIVES: This prospective study compares the therapist's return to work recommendation to the patient's actual work status and analyzes the effect of that recommendation on outcome.
METHODS: There were 1438 consecutive patients reviewed by structured telephone interviews during the two halves of the study: the control group when pain was accepted as a reason for restriction and the study group when it was not. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In the control group, 44% of the patients were recommended to RTWU; for the study group, 81% received this recommendation. Compliance was 84% for the control subjects and 78% for the study group.
RESULTS: The absolute number of patients who returned to unrestricted work doubled in the study group.
CONCLUSIONS: The probability of a successful return to normal duty increased with a recommendation of RTWU (P = 0.0001), whereas the probability of failure increased when restrictions were imposed (P = 0.0001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7825041     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199409150-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Compliance: A barrier to occupational rehabilitation?

Authors:  M K Nicholas
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-12

Review 2.  The development of an evidence-based patient booklet for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy and un-instrumented decompression.

Authors:  A H McGregor; A K Burton; P Sell; G Waddell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Physical exercise interventions to improve disability and return to work in low back pain: current insights and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  J Bart Staal; James Rainville; Julie Fritz; Willem van Mechelen; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

Review 4.  Pain: psychiatric aspects of impairment and disability.

Authors:  Gerald M Aronoff; Janice M Livengood
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2003-04

5.  Safety issues in functional capacity evaluation: findings from a trial of a new approach for evaluating clients with chronic back pain.

Authors:  Libby Gibson; Jenny Strong
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06

Review 6.  Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain.

Authors:  G Waddell; G Feder; M Lewis
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Guidelines for the identification of barriers to rehabilitation of back injuries.

Authors:  G McIntosh; T Melles; H Hall
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-09

8.  Return to work after occupational injury. Family physicians' perspectives on soft-tissue injuries.

Authors:  Jaime Guzman; Annalee Yassi; Juliette E Cooper; Jawad Khokhar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.275

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.