Literature DB >> 7823962

The glutamine-rich activation domains of human Sp1 do not stimulate transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

A S Ponticelli1, T S Pardee, K Struhl.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators have been classified on the basis of the characteristics of their activation domains. Acidic activation domains, such as those in the yeast GAL4 or GNC4 proteins and the herpes simplex virus activator VP16, stimulate RNA polymerase II transcription when introduced into a variety of eukaryotic cells. This species interchangeability demonstrates that the mechanism by which acidic activation domains function is highly conserved in the eukaryotic kingdom. To determine whether such a conservation of function exists for a different class of activation domain, we have tested whether the glutamine-rich activation domains of the human transcriptional activator Sp1 function in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We report here that the glutamine-rich domains of Sp1 do not stimulate transcription in S. cerevisiae, even when accompanied by human TATA-box binding protein (TBP) or human-yeast TATA-box binding protein hybrids. Thus, in contrast to the case for acidic activation domains, the mechanism by which glutamine-rich domains stimulate transcription is not conserved between S. cerevisiae and humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7823962      PMCID: PMC231990          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.15.2.983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  32 in total

1.  Functional differences between yeast and human TFIID are localized to the highly conserved region.

Authors:  B P Cormack; M Strubin; A S Ponticelli; K Struhl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-04-19       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins.

Authors:  P J Mitchell; R Tjian
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-07-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Diverse transcriptional functions of the multisubunit eukaryotic TFIID complex.

Authors:  B F Pugh; R Tjian
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  GC box binding induces phosphorylation of Sp1 by a DNA-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  S P Jackson; J J MacDonald; S Lees-Miller; R Tjian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Mechanism of transcriptional activation by Sp1: evidence for coactivators.

Authors:  B F Pugh; R Tjian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-06-29       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The "initiator" as a transcription control element.

Authors:  S T Smale; D Baltimore
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-04-07       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Distinct regions of Sp1 modulate DNA binding and transcriptional activation.

Authors:  J T Kadonaga; A J Courey; J Ladika; R Tjian
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 transcription in vitro: biochemical support for multiple mechanisms of transcription.

Authors:  A S Ponticelli; K Struhl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Activation of yeast polymerase II transcription by herpesvirus VP16 and GAL4 derivatives in vitro.

Authors:  D I Chasman; J Leatherwood; M Carey; M Ptashne; R D Kornberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Highly conserved residues in the bZIP domain of yeast GCN4 are not essential for DNA binding.

Authors:  W T Pu; K Struhl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  25 in total

1.  The role of AHA motifs in the activator function of tomato heat stress transcription factors HsfA1 and HsfA2.

Authors:  P Döring; E Treuter; C Kistner; R Lyck; A Chen; L Nover
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Two rice MADS domain proteins interact with OsMADS1.

Authors:  J Lim; Y H Moon; G An; S K Jang
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  The coactivator dTAF(II)110/hTAF(II)135 is sufficient to recruit a polymerase complex and activate basal transcription mediated by CREB.

Authors:  E A Felinski; P G Quinn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Conserved interaction of the papillomavirus E2 transcriptional activator proteins with human and yeast TFIIB proteins.

Authors:  J D Benson; R Lawande; P M Howley
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Three classes of mammalian transcription activation domain stimulate transcription in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  J E Remacle; G Albrecht; R Brys; G H Braus; D Huylebroeck
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Conservation and divergence of NF-Y transcriptional activation function.

Authors:  E Serra; K Zemzoumi; A di Silvio; R Mantovani; V Lardans; C Dissous
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Mutational analysis of the D1/E1 core helices and the conserved N-terminal region of yeast transcription factor IIB (TFIIB): identification of an N-terminal mutant that stabilizes TATA-binding protein-TFIIB-DNA complexes.

Authors:  C S Bangur; T S Pardee; A S Ponticelli
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  An artificial transcriptional activating region with unusual properties.

Authors:  X Lu; A Z Ansari; M Ptashne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  TAFII105 mediates activation of anti-apoptotic genes by NF-kappaB.

Authors:  A Yamit-Hezi; R Dikstein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  SPT20/ADA5 encodes a novel protein functionally related to the TATA-binding protein and important for transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S M Roberts; F Winston
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.