Literature DB >> 7823094

Interactions between the eye and hand motor systems: disruptions due to cerebellar dysfunction.

P van Donkelaar1, R G Lee.   

Abstract

1. We tested the hypothesis that interactions occur between eye and hand movements produced in conjunction. This was accomplished by having human subjects with cerebellar dysfunction and age-matched controls perform two tasks: 1) tracking a moving target with the hand and 2) performing a pointing movement to intercept the target. Our prediction was that the inaccuracies that are characteristic of eye and hand movements generated in isolation by cerebellar subjects would be accentuated in each system during combined eye-hand tasks. 2. The cerebellar subjects took longer to respond to the onset of target motion in both tasks. This was true for both the eyes and hand, regardless of whether the eye and hand movements were generated in isolation or in conjunction with each other. 3. The cerebellar subjects also displayed a larger degree of error and/or variability in their hand movements than the control subjects. A significant amount of this increased variability was due to systematic changes in the trajectory of the hand during the critical periods leading up to and after each ocular saccade. These systematic changes were consistent with an overestimation of target velocity in the perifoveal visual field. 4. The increased variability of the cerebellar subjects' hand movements was markedly reduced by restricting eye movements. A similar reduction in variability occurred when vision of the hand was restricted in the tracking task. This effect was accompanied by improved eye movements. 5. For both sets of subjects the eye movements were affected by the hand movements produced in the tracking task. In particular, eye movement accuracy was improved in the controls and degraded in the cerebellar subjects when compared with the eye movements generated in isolation. In contrast, no changes were observed in the interception task. 6. Taken together, these results imply that a reciprocal interaction occurs between the eye and hand motor systems and/or that common "upstream" sites influence each of these systems in a similar manner. The functional anatomy and neurophysiological characteristics of several sites where such interactions may take place are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7823094     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.4.1674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  16 in total

1.  Cerebellar Purkinje cell simple spike discharge encodes movement velocity in primates during visuomotor arm tracking.

Authors:  J D Coltz; M T Johnson; T J Ebner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Anticipatory control of hand and eye movements in humans during oculo-manual tracking.

Authors:  G R Barnes; J F Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Intermittent visuomotor processing in the human cerebellum, parietal cortex, and premotor cortex.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Mary A Mayka; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Prevention of coordinated eye movements and steering impairs driving performance.

Authors:  D E Marple-Horvat; M Chattington; M Anglesea; D G Ashford; M Wilson; D Keil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Eye movements coordinated with steering benefit performance even when vision is denied.

Authors:  M Wilson; S Stephenson; M Chattington; D E Marple-Horvat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Age-related differences in stepping performance during step cycle-related removal of vision.

Authors:  G J Chapman; M A Hollands
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Does a basic deficit in force control underlie cerebellar ataxia?

Authors:  Steven K Charles; Allison M Okamura; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Informational constraints on spontaneous visuomotor entrainment.

Authors:  Manuel Varlet; Colleen Bucci; Michael J Richardson; R C Schmidt
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  A cerebellar deficit in sensorimotor prediction explains movement timing variability.

Authors:  Jin Bo; Hannah J Block; Jane E Clark; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  The cerebellum and motor dysfunction in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  E Gowen; R C Miall
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.