Literature DB >> 7822608

The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research: what method for nursing?

L T Carr1.   

Abstract

The overall purpose of research for any profession is to discover the truth of the discipline. This paper examines the controversy over the methods by which truth is obtained, by examining the differences and similarities between quantitative and qualitative research. The historically negative bias against qualitative research is discussed, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches, with issues highlighted by reference to nursing research. Consideration is given to issues of sampling; the relationship between the researcher and subject; methodologies and collated data; validity; reliability, and ethical dilemmas. The author identifies that neither approach is superior to the other; qualitative research appears invaluable for the exploration of subjective experiences of patients and nurses, and quantitative methods facilitate the discovery of quantifiable information. Combining the strengths of both approaches in triangulation, if time and money permit, is also proposed as a valuable means of discovering the truth about nursing. It is argued that if nursing scholars limit themselves to one method of enquiry, restrictions will be placed on the development of nursing knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7822608     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20040716.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  14 in total

1.  Primum non nocere: could the health care system contribute to suffering? In-depth study from the perspective of terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Serge Daneault; Véronique Lussier; Suzanne Mongeau; Eveline Hudon; Pierre Paillé; Dominique Dion; Louise Yelle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Women's Auto/Biography and Dissociative Identity Disorder: Implications for Mental Health Practice.

Authors:  Kendal Tomlinson; Charley Baker
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2019-09

3.  What Impact Does Accreditation Have on Workplaces? A Qualitative Study to Explore the Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals About the Process of Accreditation.

Authors:  Amna I Alshamsi; Louise Thomson; Angeli Santos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-10

4.  Quality of life after liver transplantation for hepatitis C infection.

Authors:  Tracey Dudley; Dawn Chaplin; Collette Clifford; David John Mutimer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  "Sometimes I don't have a pulse … and I'm still alive!" Interviews with healthcare professionals to explore their experiences of and views on population-based digital health technologies.

Authors:  Flavio Tomasella; Heather May Morgan
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-05-22

6.  Study protocol: A cross-sectional study on instrumental support for transitional care among older adults with chronic diseases.

Authors:  Jianing Hua; Xiaoliu Shi; Min Cui; Yuhua Xiao; Juan Xie; Guiling Geng
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-03-06

7.  A theory of holism for nursing.

Authors:  S Woods
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  1998

8.  Experience and Perceptions of Changes in the Living Environment by Older People Losing Their Autonomy: A Qualitative Study in the Caribbean.

Authors:  Rita Chammem; Serge Domi; Claire Della Vecchia; Thomas Gilbert; Anne-Marie Schott
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-02-22

9.  Willingness of youth without disabilities to have romantic love and marital relationships with persons with disabilities.

Authors:  Bewunetu Zewude; Tewodros Habtegiorgis
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2021-06-21

10.  A qualitative study of the current state of heart failure community care in Canada: what can we learn for the future?

Authors:  Sean M Hayes; Sophie Peloquin; Jonathan G Howlett; Karen Harkness; Nadia Giannetti; Carol Rancourt; Nancy Ricard
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.