BACKGROUND: High-dose cyclosporine therapy significantly alleviates psoriasis within 2 to 4 weeks but is associated with a high rate of side effects. Reports are conflicting on the frequency and promptness of relapse after discontinuation of cyclosporine therapy. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose cyclosporine with that of etretinate and the stability of remission after replacing cyclosporine therapy with topical anthralin during tapering of cyclosporine. METHODS: In a multicenter study 210 patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis were randomly assigned to treatment with cyclosporine or etretinate. The initial dosages were 2.5 mg/kg/day for cyclosporine and 0.5 mg/kg/day for etretinate, which could be individually adjusted to 5.0 and 0.75 mg/kg/day, respectively. After a treatment phase of 10 weeks (phase 1) patients receiving cyclosporine were again randomly assigned to a group in which cyclosporine was replaced by topical dithranol (anthralin), or to another group in which the drug was tapered during the next 12 weeks (phase 2). All patients treated with etretinate discontinued therapy after 10 weeks and used topical dithranol. RESULTS:Mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index decreased by 71% in the cyclosporine group and by 47% in the etretinate group during phase 1. After 10 weeks of treatment 47% of the patients treated with cyclosporine and 10% of those treated with etretinate showed a reduction of more than 80% in skin involvement. Sixty-four percent of the cyclosporine group and 48% of the etretinate group did not require an increase in the initial dosage, resulting in a mean daily dose of 3.0 and 0.53 mg/kg, respectively. There was significant alleviation of nail involvement and joint complaints in both groups. In phase 2 the increase in mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and the incidence of relapse were significantly higher in patients in whom cyclosporine was discontinued and replaced by dithranol than in patients in whom cyclosporine was tapered or who were pretreated with etretinate. During treatment four patients from the cyclosporine group and three patients of the etretinate group discontinued the study because of side effects. CONCLUSION:Low-dose short-term cyclosporine therapy for psoriasis is, in comparison with etretinate, highly effective and well tolerated. Individually adjusted cyclosporine therapy allows the majority of patients to continue the low dosage of 2.5 mg/kg/day and still achieve a good clinical response. Remission can be better preserved by tapering the drug than by discontinuing treatment abruptly.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: High-dose cyclosporine therapy significantly alleviates psoriasis within 2 to 4 weeks but is associated with a high rate of side effects. Reports are conflicting on the frequency and promptness of relapse after discontinuation of cyclosporine therapy. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose cyclosporine with that of etretinate and the stability of remission after replacing cyclosporine therapy with topical anthralin during tapering of cyclosporine. METHODS: In a multicenter study 210 patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis were randomly assigned to treatment with cyclosporine or etretinate. The initial dosages were 2.5 mg/kg/day for cyclosporine and 0.5 mg/kg/day for etretinate, which could be individually adjusted to 5.0 and 0.75 mg/kg/day, respectively. After a treatment phase of 10 weeks (phase 1) patients receiving cyclosporine were again randomly assigned to a group in which cyclosporine was replaced by topical dithranol (anthralin), or to another group in which the drug was tapered during the next 12 weeks (phase 2). All patients treated with etretinate discontinued therapy after 10 weeks and used topical dithranol. RESULTS: Mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index decreased by 71% in the cyclosporine group and by 47% in the etretinate group during phase 1. After 10 weeks of treatment 47% of the patients treated with cyclosporine and 10% of those treated with etretinate showed a reduction of more than 80% in skin involvement. Sixty-four percent of the cyclosporine group and 48% of the etretinate group did not require an increase in the initial dosage, resulting in a mean daily dose of 3.0 and 0.53 mg/kg, respectively. There was significant alleviation of nail involvement and joint complaints in both groups. In phase 2 the increase in mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and the incidence of relapse were significantly higher in patients in whom cyclosporine was discontinued and replaced by dithranol than in patients in whom cyclosporine was tapered or who were pretreated with etretinate. During treatment four patients from the cyclosporine group and three patients of the etretinate group discontinued the study because of side effects. CONCLUSION: Low-dose short-term cyclosporine therapy for psoriasis is, in comparison with etretinate, highly effective and well tolerated. Individually adjusted cyclosporine therapy allows the majority of patients to continue the low dosage of 2.5 mg/kg/day and still achieve a good clinical response. Remission can be better preserved by tapering the drug than by discontinuing treatment abruptly.
Authors: H Ogasawara; M Sekiya; A Murashima; T Hishikawa; Y Tokano; I Sekigawa; N Iida; H Hashimoto; S Hirose Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 1998 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Bruce E Strober; Jennifer Clay Cather; David Cohen; Jeffrey J Crowley; Kenneth B Gordon; Alice B Gottlieb; Arthur F Kavanaugh; Neil J Korman; Gerald G Krueger; Craig L Leonardi; Sergio Schwartzman; Jeffrey M Sobell; Gary E Solomon; Melodie Young Journal: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Date: 2012-03-17