Literature DB >> 7821507

Are multiple cesarean sections safe?

D S Seidman1, I Paz, A Nadu, S Dollberg, D K Stevenson, R Gale, S Mashiach, G Barkai.   

Abstract

To assess the maternal and neonatal risk associated with high-order cesarean sections, a case-control study was carried out in two university affiliated maternity wards. The outcome of 154 pregnancies of women undergoing cesarean section for the 4th time or more was compared with 148 women sectioned for the 2nd or 3rd time and 132 women of similar age and parity after spontaneous birth. The main outcome measures were maternal operative and postoperative morbidity and neonatal prematurity and its complications, Apgar scores, and the need for intensive care. Women undergoing multiple (> or = 4) cesarean sections had significantly more intra-abdominal adhesions (P < 0.0001) than women sectioned for the 2nd or 3rd time. However, the time interval from incision to delivery and the total duration of operation were similar. The postoperative course was not adversely affected by multiple cesarean sections. A high incidence (16.2%) of preterm cesarean deliveries was noted in the study group. This was due to non-elective repeat cesarean delivery rather than to poor timing of scheduled cesarean sections. The significantly increased (P < 0.05) need for neonatal intensive care was explained by the higher occurrence of prematurity. Low Apgar scores (< or = 7) at 1 and 5 min were significantly (P < 0.01) related to multiple cesarean sections, even after controlling for the effect of gestational age. We conclude that multiple cesarean sections pose little risk for the mother, but may be associated with increased neonatal risk, attributed mainly to preterm non-elective cesarean sections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7821507     DOI: 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90102-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  4 in total

1.  Non-pregnant patients' preference for delivery route.

Authors:  Andrea R Thurman; James S Zoller; Steven E Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-05-14

2.  Maternal outcomes of cesarean sections: do generalists' patients have different outcomes than specialists' patients?

Authors:  Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Sarah Newbery; Len Kelly; Bruce Weaver; Scott Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Is it safe to have multiple repeat cesarean sections? A high volume tertiary care center experience.

Authors:  Alper Biler; Atalay Ekin; Aykut Ozcan; Abdurrahman Hamdi Inan; Tayfun Vural; Emrah Toz
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Intra-operative complications increase with successive number of cesarean sections: Myth or fact?

Authors:  Shumaila Zia; Muhammad Rafique
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2014-05-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.