Literature DB >> 7820798

Basic statistics for clinicians: 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals.

G Guyatt1, R Jaeschke, N Heddle, D Cook, H Shannon, S Walter.   

Abstract

In the second of four articles, the authors discuss the "estimation" approach to interpreting study results. Whereas, in hypothesis testing, study results lead the reader to reject or accept a null hypothesis, in estimation the reader can assess whether a result is strong or weak, definitive or not. A confidence interval, based on the observed result and the size of the sample, is calculated. It provides a range of probabilities within which the true probability would lie 95% or 90% of the time, depending on the precision desired. It also provides a way of determining whether the sample is large enough to make the trial definitive. If the lower boundary of a confidence interval is above the threshold considered clinically significant, then the trial is positive and definitive, if the lower boundary is somewhat below the threshold, the trial is positive, but studies with larger samples are needed. Similarly, if the upper boundary of a confidence interval is below the threshold considered significant, the trial is negative and definitive. However, a negative result with a confidence interval that crosses the threshold means that trials with larger samples are needed to make a definitive determination of clinical importance.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7820798      PMCID: PMC1337571     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  11 in total

1.  Confidence intervals assess both clinical significance and statistical significance.

Authors:  L E Braitman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Estimation issues in clinical trials and overviews.

Authors:  S J Pocock; M D Hughes
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Confidence intervals for reporting results of clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Confidence intervals.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  A D Oxman; D L Sackett; G H Guyatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D L Sackett; D J Cook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-01-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D L Sackett; D J Cook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  A D Oxman; D J Cook; G H Guyatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-11-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  High-dose acetylsalicylic acid after cerebral infarction. A Swedish Cooperative Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Relative efficacy of vasodilator therapy in chronic congestive heart failure. Implications of randomized trials.

Authors:  C D Mulrow; J P Mulrow; W D Linn; C Aguilar; G Ramirez
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  13 in total

1.  Reporting of numerical and statistical differences in abstracts: improving but not optimal.

Authors:  Eric Dryver; Janet E Hux
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Are Modic changes prognostic for recovery in a cohort of patients with non-specific low back pain?

Authors:  Anne Keller; Eleanor Boyle; Thomas A Skog; J David Cassidy; Erik Bautz-Holter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Confidence interval or p-value?: part 4 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Jean-Baptist du Prel; Gerhard Hommel; Bernd Röhrig; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  New evidence demonstrates that self-monitoring of blood glucose does not improve outcomes in type 2 diabetes-when this practice is not applied properly.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

5.  Statistics: a brief overview.

Authors:  Ryan Winters; Andrew Winters; Ronald G Amedee
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

Review 6.  How to perform a critical appraisal of diagnostic tests: 7 steps.

Authors:  Aamer Chughtai; Aine Marie Kelly; Paul Cronin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09

7.  Outcome measurements in orthopedic.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Brad Petrisor; Emil Schemitsch
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature.

Authors:  Jonathan D Dodd; Peter M MacEneaney; Dermot E Malone
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  A sample size planning approach that considers both statistical significance and clinical significance.

Authors:  Bin Jia; Henry S Lynn
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Statistics in clinical research: Important considerations.

Authors:  Howard Barkan
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.