Literature DB >> 7820479

Survival after peranal and abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma.

A P Savage1, H Reece-Smith, R G Faber.   

Abstract

The outcome of a consecutive series of 47 patients with rectal cancer treated by endoscopic transanal resection or peranal local excision was contrasted with that of 42 patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection. Surgery was considered curative for 35 and nine patients treated by abdominoperineal and peranal resection respectively (P < 0.001). Patients undergoing peranal excision were older than those treated by abdominoperineal resection (median 77 versus 69 years, P < 0.01). The 5-year survival rate of patients undergoing peranal resection was 24 per cent compared with 33 per cent for those treated by the abdominoperineal procedure (P < 0.005). When surgery was palliative the survival rate after both procedures was the same. Survival after peranal excision was significantly poorer than that after abdominoperineal resection but this may be acceptable when the stage of disease and age of the patients are taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7820479     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800811028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  1 in total

1.  Ten-year experience of endoscopic transanal resection.

Authors:  Christopher D Sutton; Leslie-Jayne Marshall; Steve A White; Neil Flint; David P Berry; Michael J Kelly
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.