Literature DB >> 7820334

A method for the evaluation of individual bioequivalence.

L Endrenyi1.   

Abstract

A method is presented for the evaluation of individual bioequivalence. The approach is simple and effective. It considers two drugs to be inequivalent in individuals if their contrast shows larger variation than that observed within formulations, which are repeatedly administered to the subjects. The necessary information can be obtained in 3- or 4-period crossover trials, in which individuals receive not only both drug products but also the replicate application of at least one of them. In the implementation of the procedure, it is suggested that two drug products could be considered to show individual bioequivalence if the upper, one-sided confidence limit for the ratio of intraindividual variances estimated between and within formulations does not exceed a preset critical value, Fcr. For initial considerations, a confidence level of 90% and Fcr = 4.0 are recommended. The intraindividual variances between and within formulations can be estimated either by simple, direct calculations or by an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The structure of the latter is different from that of the ANOVA applied for the assessment of average bioequivalence. Another approach assessing individual bioequivalence from an estimated variance component is less favoured. Graphical, exploratory analysis of the multiperiod crossover trials is recommended and illustrated. The suggested procedures are demonstrated on an example evaluating the individual (and average) bioequivalence of olsalazine tablets and capsules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7820334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0946-1965            Impact factor:   1.366


  6 in total

1.  Subject-by-formulation interaction in bioequivalence: conceptual and statistical issues. FDA Population/Individual Bioequivalence Working Group. Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  W W Hauck; T Hyslop; M L Chen; R Patnaik; R L Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Evaluation of the bioequivalence of highly-variable drugs and drug products.

Authors:  L Tothfalusi; L Endrenyi; K K Midha; M J Rawson; J W Hubbard
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Bioequivalence assessment: a pharmaceutical industry perspective.

Authors:  J Godbillon; J M Cardot; J B Lecaillon; G Lefevre; A Sioufi
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Individual bioequivalence. New concepts in the statistical assessment of bioequivalence metrics. FDA Individual Bioequivalence Working Group.

Authors:  R N Patnaik; L J Lesko; M L Chen; R L Williams
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Measuring switchability and prescribability: when is average bioequivalence sufficient?

Authors:  W W Hauck; S Anderson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-12

6.  Individualizing therapy - in search of approaches to maximize the benefit of drug treatment (II).

Authors:  Cornel Pater
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-08-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.