Literature DB >> 7819718

Increasing sensitivity and specificity of Doppler sonographic detection of renal transplant rejection with serial investigation technique.

M Hollenbeck1, N Hilbert, F Meusel, B Grabensee.   

Abstract

Acute rejection episodes are the most common cause leading to loss of renal grafts in the early postoperative phase. Doppler sonography presents a noninvasive tool to detect increased arterial blood flow resistance as a result of rejection. This can be measured by the increase in the resistive index (RI) and the pulsatility index (PI). In a prospective study including 65 consecutive patients we investigated whether the detection of rejection episodes is improved by determining RI or PI serially twice a week instead of performing a single examination in cases of transplant dysfunction. In 330 examinations with a color-coded Doppler device (Philips QAD 1, Philips Medical Systems Hamburg, Germany) flow profiles were obtained by means of pulse-wave Doppler over at least three interlobar arteries of the renal transplant and RI and PI were calculated. In 41 cases primary rejections were better recognized by an increase in PI compared to the preceding value than by the absolute PI value (with a sensitivity of 90%; specificity was 76% and 42% respectively). The RI was less specific (with a sensitivity of 90%; specificity was 47% for the relative RI increase and 30% for the absolute RI value). The continuous PI increase started an average of 3.3 days (95% CI-15.25 to + 1.55) before rejection was diagnosed. Vascular rejection episodes showed higher PI values than interstitial rejections (3.86 +/- 2.14 vs. 2.19 +/- 0.87; P < 0.01). The serial investigation technique of PI allows better recognition of rejection episodes than the single measurement of RI or PI performed so far. Doppler sonography recognizes rejection at an early stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7819718     DOI: 10.1007/bf00227454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Investig        ISSN: 0941-0198


  36 in total

1.  Doppler assessment in renal transplantation.

Authors:  D C Harris; V Antico; R Allen; S Gruenewald; S Lawrence; J H Stewart; J R Chapman
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection and in monitoring the effect of treatment.

Authors:  K Rasmussen; E Pedersen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.713

Review 3.  Evaluation of renal transplant dysfunction by duplex Doppler sonography: a prospective study and review of the literature.

Authors:  R R Perrella; A J Duerinckx; F N Tessler; G M Danovitch; A Wilkinson; S Gonzalez; A H Cohen; E G Grant
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Renal allografts: prospective analysis of Doppler sonography.

Authors:  K S Allen; D K Jorkasky; P H Arger; M G Velchik; K Grumbach; B G Coleman; M C Mintz; S E Betsch; L J Perloff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Analysis of the arterial blood flow patterns of normal and allografted kidneys by the directional ultrasonic Doppler technique.

Authors:  M Arima; M Ishibashi; M Usami; S Sagawa; S Mizutani; T Sonoda; S Ichikawa; H Ihara; S Nagano
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Evaluation of renal transplant rejection by duplex Doppler examination: value of the resistive index.

Authors:  M D Rifkin; L Needleman; M E Pasto; A B Kurtz; P M Foy; E McGlynn; C Canino; O H Baltarowich; R G Pennell; B B Goldberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Predictability of renal allograft prognosis during rejection crisis by ultrasonic Doppler flow technique.

Authors:  M Arima; S Takahara; H Ihara; Y Ichikawa; M Ishibashi; S Sagawa; S Nagano; M Takaha; T Sonoda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Doppler signal quantitation in renal allografts: comparison in normal and rejecting transplants, with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  C M Rigsby; P N Burns; G G Weltin; B Chen; M Bia; K J Taylor
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Noninvasive surveillance of allografted kidneys by ultrasonic duplex scanning.

Authors:  A M de Gaetano; G Boldrini; G Nanni; F Serino; I Giovannini; M Castagneto
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Duplex Doppler US of renal allografts: causes of elevated resistive index.

Authors:  S Don; K K Kopecky; R S Filo; S B Leapman; J V Thomalla; J A Jones; E C Klatte
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Statistical techniques to evaluate the accuracy of Doppler sonographic diagnosis and prognosis.

Authors:  M Gonser; P Kahle
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Evaluation of renal allograft function early after transplantation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Ute Eisenberger; Harriet C Thoeny; Tobias Binser; Mathias Gugger; Felix J Frey; Chris Boesch; Peter Vermathen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Pathomechanisms and the diagnosis of arterial hypertension in pediatric renal allograft recipients.

Authors:  R Büscher; U Vester; A-M Wingen; Peter F Hoyer
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.714

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.