Literature DB >> 7819355

Sampling for vaginal candidosis: how good is it?

J Emmerson1, A Gunputrao, J Hawkswell, A Dexter, R Sykes, S Searle, A Cross, P M Nathan.   

Abstract

In defined patient populations attending a genitourinary medicine department, screening for vaginal candidosis resulted in 26.3% positive rate. Microscopy using Gram-stained slide was useful in early diagnosis and resulted in the detection of 64.8% of symptomatic cases. Samples from the anterior fornix proved most sensitive for culture diagnosis while the left lateral vaginal wall proved least sensitive (positive predictive value 0.88 cf 0.81).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7819355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  3 in total

1.  Vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Authors:  D J White; A Vanthuyne
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Microscopic features of vaginal candidiasis and their relation to symptomatology.

Authors:  C Sonnex; W Lefort
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Can the diagnosis of recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis be improved by use of vaginal lavage samples and cultures on chromogenic agar?

Authors:  N Novikova; A Rodrigues; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.