Literature DB >> 7819004

Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children.

T Buur1, M G Bradbury, S W Smye, J T Brocklebank.   

Abstract

The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generation rate (G) was also found from a 1-week collection of dialysate and urine (OWC). Nine children aged 2-18 years and weighing 10.6-39.9 kg were examined over 1 week (25 treatments). UKM3 and UKM2 gave almost identical results, but deviated from PDC and OWC. The two indirect methods overestimated G by 24% and 18%. However, the correlations between the results were very high for all variables and all methods (r > or = 0.96). Repeating UKM3 and UKM2 mid-week for 5 consecutive weeks, the following coefficients of variation were found: for the normalised whole body urea clearance (Kt/V) 10% and 11%, respectively; for normalised protein catabolic rate 17% and 14%. It is concluded that all tested methods can be used, but each method requires its own reference interval. Results of UKM seem to vary somewhat more than in adults. This should be considered when assessing children by such methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7819004     DOI: 10.1007/bf00858131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.714


  22 in total

Review 1.  Adequacy of dialysis: a critical analysis.

Authors:  R C Vanholder; S M Ringoir
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Precision of hemodialysis urea kinetic modeling: empirical data and Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  T Buur
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Modeling urea kinetics with two vs. three BUN measurements. A critical comparison.

Authors:  T A Depner; A Cheer
Journal:  ASAIO Trans       Date:  1989 Jul-Sep

4.  DiaKin: an integrated program package for hemodialysis kinetics.

Authors:  T Buur
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Urea kinetics and clinical evaluation of the haemodialysis patient.

Authors:  T Buur; T Timpka; M Lundberg
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Enzymatic kinetic rate and end-point analyses of substrate, by use of a GeMSAEC fast analyzer.

Authors:  T O Tiffany; J M Jansen; C A Burtis; J B Overton; C D Scott
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Haemodialysis recirculation measured using a femoral artery sample.

Authors:  T Buur; E J Will
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Modeling success or failure of dialysis therapy: the National Cooperative Dialysis Study.

Authors:  N M Laird; C S Berkey; E G Lowrie
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 10.545

9.  Paediatric haemodialysis: estimation of treatment efficiency in the presence of urea rebound.

Authors:  S W Smye; J H Evans; E Will; J T Brocklebank
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1992-02

10.  Comparison of two methods of kinetic modeling.

Authors:  P W Ellis; P S Malchesky; M O Magnusson; M Goormastic; S Nakamoto
Journal:  Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs       Date:  1984
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Hemodialysis in children: general practical guidelines.

Authors:  M Fischbach; A Edefonti; C Schröder; A Watson
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 2.  Drug dosing during intermittent hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy : special considerations in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Michael A Veltri; Alicia M Neu; Barbara A Fivush; Rulan S Parekh; Susan L Furth
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.022

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.