BACKGROUND: To compare the quality of life, nutritional status, and gastrointestinal profiles of post-Whipple patients and postcholecystectomy patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of post-Whipple procedure patients and age- and sex-matched postcholecystectomy patients was performed. Quality of life was assessed using six instruments: Time Trade-off Technique, Direct Questioning of Objectives, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, Sickness Impact Profile, Physician Global Assessment, and Visick Scale. A gastrointestinal symptomatology questionnaire was completed. Nutritional status was assessed by weight, the Subjective Global Assessment instrument, and skin anthropometry. Fasting and postprandial serum gastrin, somatostatin, insulin, pancreatic glucagon, enteroglucagon, and pancreatic polypeptide were measured. RESULTS: The quality of life and gastrointestinal function of the Whipple patients was excellent and was not significantly different from that of the control subjects. There were no significant differences in gastrointestinal symptomatology although 5 Whipple patients complained of greasy bowel movements, and 1 patient reported difficulty maintaining weight. Despite this, nutritional status was within normal limits in all subjects. Six patients in the Whipple group followed a diabetic diet, 1 required insulin, and 3 required an oral hypoglycemic agent, whereas none of the control subjects were diabetic. There were no significant differences in the mean basal, peak, or integrated postprandial responses of the gut hormones with the exception of pancreatic polypeptide and gastrin (in patients having a standard Whipple procedure only). CONCLUSION: Quality of life and nutritional status are excellent in patients following a Whipple procedure.
BACKGROUND: To compare the quality of life, nutritional status, and gastrointestinal profiles of post-Whipple patients and postcholecystectomy patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of post-Whipple procedure patients and age- and sex-matched postcholecystectomy patients was performed. Quality of life was assessed using six instruments: Time Trade-off Technique, Direct Questioning of Objectives, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, Sickness Impact Profile, Physician Global Assessment, and Visick Scale. A gastrointestinal symptomatology questionnaire was completed. Nutritional status was assessed by weight, the Subjective Global Assessment instrument, and skin anthropometry. Fasting and postprandial serum gastrin, somatostatin, insulin, pancreatic glucagon, enteroglucagon, and pancreatic polypeptide were measured. RESULTS: The quality of life and gastrointestinal function of the Whipple patients was excellent and was not significantly different from that of the control subjects. There were no significant differences in gastrointestinal symptomatology although 5 Whipple patients complained of greasy bowel movements, and 1 patient reported difficulty maintaining weight. Despite this, nutritional status was within normal limits in all subjects. Six patients in the Whipple group followed a diabetic diet, 1 required insulin, and 3 required an oral hypoglycemic agent, whereas none of the control subjects were diabetic. There were no significant differences in the mean basal, peak, or integrated postprandial responses of the gut hormones with the exception of pancreatic polypeptide and gastrin (in patients having a standard Whipple procedure only). CONCLUSION: Quality of life and nutritional status are excellent in patients following a Whipple procedure.
Authors: M B Farnell; G H Sakorafas; M G Sarr; C M Rowland; G G Tsiotos; D R Farley; D M Nagorney Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2000 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Francesco Tonelli; Geri Fratini; Gabriella Nesi; Maria Silvia Tommasi; Giacomo Batignani; Alberto Falchetti; Maria Luisa Brandi Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 12.969