Literature DB >> 7817957

Direct light transmittance through ceramic brackets.

T Eliades1, W M Johnston, G Eliades.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the degree of direct light transmittance (%T) of various types of esthetic brackets and to correlate these values with their structure, morphologic factors, and composition. Eight types of brackets were used in the study; six brackets of each type were tested. An ultraviolet-visible spectroscopic direct transmission analysis was performed at 320 to 700 nm wavelength range. From each spectrum, the %T corresponded to the peak absorbance wavelength of the photoinitiator of the polymerization was recorded (468 nm). Recorded data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Scheffe's test at alpha = 0.05 significance level. In addition, scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were used to reveal the structure and morphologic factors of the brackets tested. Highest %T values (Mean +/- 1 SD) were obtained from a monocrystal type of bracket (Starfire ["A" Company, San Diego, Calif.] 35.02 +/- 1.59%), followed by a polycrystalline (Fascination [Dentaurum, Pforzhein, Germany] 5.70 +/- 1.41%) and a ceramic/polycarbonate base one (Ceramaflex [TP Orthodontics, Inc., La Porte, Ind.] 4.02 +/- 0.96%). Also other brands presented the following data: Allure (GAC, Central Islip, N.Y.) 3.62 +/- 0.5%; Transcend 2000 (Unitek/3M, Monrovia, Calif.) 2.62 +/- 0.5%; Fascination (edgewise) (Dentaurum, Pforzhein, Germany) 1.97 +/- 0.69%; Lumina (Ormco, Glendora, Calif.) 1.57 +/- 0.5%; Signature (RMO, Denver, Colo.) 1.22 +/- 0.5%. The results showed that the structure, morphologic factors, and composition of the brackets tested were found to affect direct light transmission significantly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7817957     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70152-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Effects of different application durations of ER:YAG laser on intrapulpal temperature change during debonding.

Authors:  Didem Nalbantgil; M Oguz Oztoprak; Murat Tozlu; Tülin Arun
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Evaluating the Type of Light Transmittance in Mono Crystalline, Poly Crystalline and Sapphire Brackets- An Invitro Spectrofluorometer Study.

Authors:  Jauhar P Mohamed; Pradeep Babu Kommi; M Senthil Kumar; Arani Nanda Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-08-01

3.  Rapid debonding of polycrystalline ceramic orthodontic brackets with an Er:YAG laser: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ambili Roselina Mundethu; Norbert Gutknecht; Rene Franzen
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Comparison of the bonding strengths of second- and third-generation light-emitting diode light-curing units.

Authors:  Hee-Min Lee; Sang-Cheol Kim; Kyung-Hwa Kang; Na-Young Chang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Debonding of ceramic brackets by Er:YAG laser.

Authors:  Fidan Alakus Sabuncuoglu; Seyda Ersahan; Ergul Erturk
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2016-04-01

6.  Does the CO2 laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?

Authors:  Fábio Lourenço Romano; Giovanna Pessoti; Rodrigo Galo; Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva; Marília Pacífico Lucisano; Maria Cristina Borsatto; Paulo Nelson-Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Translucency of Dental Ceramic, Post and Bracket.

Authors:  Yong-Keun Lee
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.