Literature DB >> 7817904

Color flow Doppler determination of transmitral flow and orifice area in mitral stenosis: experimental evaluation of the proximal flow-convergence method.

T Shiota1, M Jones, L M Valdes-Cruz, R Shandas, I Yamada, D J Sahn.   

Abstract

To evaluate the in vivo accuracy of color Doppler flow-convergence methods for determining transmitral flow volumes and effective orifice areas in mitral stenosis, we studied two models for flow-convergence surface geometry, a hemispheric (HS) model and an oblate hemispheroid (OH) model in a chronic animal model with quantifiable mitral flows. Color Doppler flow mapping of the proximal flow-convergence region has been reported to be useful for evaluation of intracardiac flows. Flow-convergence methods in patients with mitral stenosis that use HS assumption for the isovelocity surface have resulted in underestimation of actual flows. Chronic mitral stenosis was created surgically in six sheep with annuloplasty rings (group 1) and 11 sheep with bioprosthetic porcine valves (group 2). Hemodynamic and echocardiographic/Doppler studies (n = 18 in group 1; n = 21 in group 2) were performed 20 to 34 weeks later. Left ventricular inflow obstruction was of varied severity, with mean transmitral valve gradients in group 1 ranging from 1.3 to 18 mm Hg and in group 2 ranging from 6.3 to 25.6 mm Hg. Although transmitral flows derived by both geometric flow convergence models showed significant correlations with reference cardiac outputs, the correlations for the OH model were better than those for the HS model (group 1, r = 0.86 for the OH model vs r = 0.72 for the HS model; group 2; r = 0.84 for the OH model vs r = 0.62 for the HS model). The OH model was also superior to the HS model in determining effective orifice areas compared to reference orifice areas determined by postmortem planimetry of anatomic orifices (group 1 only, r = 0.64 for OH vs 0.58 for HS), by the Gorlin and Gorlin formula (group 1, r = 0.63 for OH vs 0.72 for HS; group 2, r = 0.82 for OH vs 0.76 for HS), and by the Doppler pressure half-time method (group 1, r = 0.76 for OH vs 0.69 for HS; group 2, r = 0.84 for OH vs 0.62 for HS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7817904     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90051-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  4 in total

1.  A simple different method to use proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) for measuring mitral valve area.

Authors:  Mehmet Uzun; Oben Baysan; Kursad Erinc; Mustafa Ozkan; Cemal Sag; Celal Genc; Hayrettin Karaeren; Mehmet Yokusoglu; Ersoy Isik
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Stenotic lesions.

Authors:  B Wranne; H Baumgartner; F Flachskampf; M Hasenkam; F Pinto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Clinical application in routine practice of the proximal flow convergence method to calculate the mitral surface area in mitral valve stenosis.

Authors:  Ahmed Bennis; Abdennasser Drighil; Christophe Tribouilloy; Asmaa Drighil; Nacer Chraibi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Radius of proximal isovelocity surface area in the assessment of rheumatic mitral stenosis: Connecting flow to anatomy and hemodynamics.

Authors:  Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar; Mohamed Ahmed Abdel-Rahman; Hala Raslan; Osama Rifaie
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-03-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.