Literature DB >> 7817823

Displacement and translocation of osteoblast-like cells by osteoclasts.

J Ferrier1, S L Xia, E Lagan, J E Aubin, J N Heersche.   

Abstract

Rabbit osteoclasts and rabbit osteoblast-like stroma cells (OB cells) were placed onto plastic surfaces and the migration patterns of individual osteoclasts and osteoclast-OB interactions were analyzed with time-lapse recording. To induce directed migration, the cultures were exposed to an electrical field of 0.01 or 0.1 V/mm. At 0.1 V/mm, osteoclasts moved directly toward the anode in some cases, clearing OB cells from their path of migration. In other cases, osteoclasts migrated toward the anode for part of the time but then changed direction and moved toward groups of OB cells. Observations were made on osteoclasts interacting with single OB cells or small colonies and on osteoclasts interacting with OB monolayers, at both field strengths; the results were independent of field strength. There were several characteristic behaviors. With single OB cells and small OB colonies, retraction of OB cells upon contact with the osteoclast was the predominant mechanism whereby these cells begin to move out of the path of the osteoclast. A pronounced ruffling or blebbing of the OB cell membrane often followed retraction. When osteoclasts displaced OB cells that were part of a monolayer, extension of an osteoclast lamellipodium underneath the edge of the OB cell layer generally preceded partial retraction of the OB cells involved. It sometimes appeared as if the detached or partially detached OB cells were "pushed" by the osteoclast, which in some cases resulted in OB cells being moved hundreds of microns in a period of a few hours, at rates comparable to the normal speed for osteoclast migration (congruent to 100 microns/h), much faster than the normal speed for OB cells (congruent to 10 microns/h).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7817823     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  4 in total

1.  An integrated computational model of the bone microenvironment in bone-metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Arturo Araujo; Leah M Cook; Conor C Lynch; David Basanta
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Bone remodeling: an operational process ensuring survival and bone mechanical competence.

Authors:  Simona Bolamperti; Isabella Villa; Alessandro Rubinacci
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 13.362

Review 3.  The reversal phase of the bone-remodeling cycle: cellular prerequisites for coupling resorption and formation.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Delaisse
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-08-06

4.  Optogenetic activation of Plexin-B1 reveals contact repulsion between osteoclasts and osteoblasts.

Authors:  Abhijit Deb Roy; Taofei Yin; Shilpa Choudhary; Vladimir Rodionov; Carol C Pilbeam; Yi I Wu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 14.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.