Literature DB >> 7817198

[Computerized tomography measurement of torsion angle of the lower extremities].

W Strecker1, M Franzreb, T Pfeiffer, S Pokar, M Wikström, L Kinzl.   

Abstract

The precise evaluation of post-traumatic deformities is indispensable when planning a corrective osteotomy. Torsional angles of the lower extremities of 186 patients were measured using CT. The mean age of the studied population was 34 years (18-80). It consisted of 131 men and 55 women. All patients had sustained a fracture of at least one of the leg's bony segments. The normal femoral (n = 293) inward torsion measured 23.47 degrees +/- 17.16 degrees (mean +/- 2 SD). Normal tibia (n = 263) outward torsion was 34.03 degrees +/- 17.22 degrees. The intraindividual torsional differences were not normally distributed. Normal femoral (n = 103) intraindividual torsional difference measured 11 degrees (95% percentile) and 15 degrees (99% percentile), with a median of 4 degrees. The tibiae (n = 76) showed a normal intraindividual torsional difference of 12 degrees (95% percentile) and 15 degrees (99% percentile). Right tibiae showed a statistically significant greater outward rotation when compared to their left counterpart (P < 0.001). No correlation to sex could be established. Preoperative planning of a corrective osteotomy should include the geometric evaluation of all four bony segments of the leg. Intraindividual torsional differences must be considered. A corrective osteotomy appears to be unnecessary with a torsional difference smaller than 15 degrees in the femora and smaller than 15 degrees in the tibiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7817198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  9 in total

1.  [Femoral osteotomy for patellofemoral instability].

Authors:  S Hinterwimmer; N Rosenstiel; A Lenich; S Waldt; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Compression nailing for posttraumatic rotational femoral deformities: open versus minimally invasive technique.

Authors:  Thomas Mückley; Christian Lerch; Oliver Gonschorek; Ivan Marintschev; Volker Bühren; Gunther O Hofmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Not Available].

Authors:  W Strecker; P Keppler; L Kinzl
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  [Determining the femoral antetorsion angle with a fluoroscopy-based optoelectronic navigation system: a precision analysis].

Authors:  C Keil; J von Recum; L-P Nolte; A Wentzensen; P A Grützner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  [Femoral nail osteosynthesis. Mechanical factors influencing the femoral antetorsion].

Authors:  M Citak; D Kendoff; M Citak; M J Gardner; M Oszwald; C Krettek; T Hüfner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  [Preventing malrotation during intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures].

Authors:  R E Hilgert; K Ohrendorf; F K W Schäfer; P J Schäfer; M Müller; R Trompetter; H-J Egbers
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Effect of the lower limb rotational alignment on tibiofemoral contact pressure.

Authors:  Mohamed Kenawey; Emmanouil Liodakis; Christian Krettek; Sven Ostermeier; Tatiana Horn; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The physiological range of femoral antetorsion.

Authors:  Sebastian Decker; Eduardo M Suero; Nael Hawi; Christian W Müller; Christian Krettek; Musa Citak
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  [Not Available].

Authors:  C Krettek; P Schandelmaier; H Tscherne
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.286

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.