Literature DB >> 7816541

Heuristic judgment of mass ratio in two-body collisions.

D L Gilden1, D R Proffitt.   

Abstract

The logic of judging relative mass from a two-body collision is developed from data presented by Runeson and Vedeler (1993). Data from two experiments are analyzed on a point-by-point basis, and strong support for the theory that mass-ratio judgments are mediated by separate speed and angle heuristics is shown. This analysis is accomplished by reducing the collision event to two elementary features: the presence of ricochet and the ratio of exit speeds. The heuristics that both ricochet and greater exit speed specify relative lightness are shown to explain the basic patterns of data presented by Runeson and Vedeler.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7816541     DOI: 10.3758/bf03208364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  12 in total

1.  Influence of animation on dynamical judgments.

Authors:  M K Kaiser; D R Proffitt; S M Whelan; H Hecht
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Understanding collision dynamics.

Authors:  D L Gilden; D R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Observers' sensitivity to dynamic anomalies in collisions.

Authors:  M K Kaiser; D R Proffitt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-09

4.  The indispensability of precollision kinematics in the visual perception of relative mass.

Authors:  S Runeson; D Vedeler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-06

5.  Factors influencing velocity coding in the human visual system.

Authors:  G A Orban; J de Wolf; H Maes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The development of sensitivity to causally relevant dynamic information.

Authors:  M K Kaiser; D R Proffitt
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1984-08

7.  Visual perception of lifted weight.

Authors:  S Runeson; G Frykholm
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A local mechanism for differential velocity detection.

Authors:  S P McKee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Understanding natural dynamics.

Authors:  D R Proffitt; D L Gilden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Understanding wheel dynamics.

Authors:  D R Proffitt; M K Kaiser; S M Whelan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Causal impressions: predicting when, not just whether.

Authors:  Michael E Young; Ester T Rogers; Joshua S Beckmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

2.  Rotational kinematics influence multimodal perception of heaviness.

Authors:  Matthew Streit; Kevin Shockley; Anthony W Morris; Michael A Riley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

3.  Heuristics and invariants in dynamic event perception: Immunized concepts or nonstatements?

Authors:  H Hecht
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

4.  Support for the cue-heuristic model is based on suboptimal observer performance: response to Gilden and Proffitt (1994)

Authors:  S Runeson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11

5.  When it all falls down: the relationship between intuitive physics and spatial cognition.

Authors:  Alex Mitko; Jason Fischer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-05-19

6.  Intuitive physical reasoning about objects' masses transfers to a visuomotor decision task consistent with Newtonian physics.

Authors:  Nils Neupärtl; Fabian Tatai; Constantin A Rothkopf
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Testing Bayesian and heuristic predictions of mass judgments of colliding objects.

Authors:  Adam N Sanborn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.