Literature DB >> 7815674

Assessment of body composition by skinfold anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance technique: a comparative study.

G Vansant1, L Van Gaal, I De Leeuw.   

Abstract

Both skinfold anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance are indirect, simple bedside methods to assess body composition. It is not clear, however, whether the results of these methods are comparable. In this study, body composition was determined in 449 subjects by skinfold anthropometry and by bioelectrical impedance. Percentage of body fat ranged from 8.0% to 47.5% with the skinfold technique and from 0.6% to 78.5% with bioelectrical impedance. Linear regression analysis showed a significant positive correlation (r = .84; p < .0001) between the results of both techniques. However, plot analysis showed that, in comparison with bioelectrical impedance, skinfold measurements overestimate fat mass in the lower weight range and underestimate it in obese subjects. We conclude that the results of skinfold anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance are not comparable, especially in the extreme ranges of body fat. At the present time, other, more rigorous techniques are necessary to assess body composition accurately, in the extreme ranges of body fat in particular.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7815674     DOI: 10.1177/0148607194018005427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  3 in total

1.  Male and female differences in variability with estimating body fat composition using skinfold calipers.

Authors:  Marc P McRae
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-10-08

2.  One-year increment of fat mass and lean body mass of Japanese school children using bioelectrical impedance.

Authors:  K Kida; Y Nishizawa; K Saito; H Nakamura; H Fukuda; M Ishida; Y Kimura; R Mita
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Assessment Methods of Body Fat in Recreational Marathon Runners: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis versus Skinfold Thickness.

Authors:  Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Rodrigo Luiz Vancini; Marília Dos Santos Andrade; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; Beat Knechtle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.