Literature DB >> 7815659

Requesting consent for an invasive procedure in newly deceased adults.

R M McNamara1, S Monti, J J Kelly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ethical concerns exist over the performance of medical procedures, such as endotracheal intubation, on newly deceased patients without family consent. This study examined the process of obtaining consent for the purpose of performing an invasive procedure in newly deceased adults.
DESIGN: A prospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: The families of patients who died during a 5-month period were requested to provide consent to perform wire-guided retrograde tracheal intubation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between success and failure in obtaining consent including information on the decreased, family reasons for their decision, and the experience of those requesting consent.
RESULTS: Consent was requested from 44 families and 26 (59%) agreed to the procedure. This success rate was achieved despite the lack of a prior relationship with the family by the persons requesting consent. Consent was obtained more frequently in unexpected than expected deaths (77% vs 41%, P = .03). There were no differences in success rates for consent for age, race, sex, or do-not-resuscitate status of the deceased. Spouses consented more frequently than children (77% vs 50%, P = .25). The two physicians reported greater comfort in requesting consent than the nurse anesthetist investigator. In one instance, the consent process may have increased the emotional distress of the family.
CONCLUSION: Consent can frequently be obtained from families for an invasive procedure in newly deceased adults. Physicians should reconsider the practice of performing postmortem procedures without obtaining family consent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Medical College of Pennsylvania

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7815659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  5 in total

1.  May we practise endotracheal intubation on the newly dead?

Authors:  M Ardagh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal.

Authors:  P Le Morvan; B Stock
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Heart Rythm Society expert consensus statement on electrophysiology laboratory standards: process, protocols, equipment, personnel, and safety.

Authors:  David E Haines; Salwa Beheiry; Joseph G Akar; Janice L Baker; Doug Beinborn; John F Beshai; Neil Brysiewicz; Christine Chiu-Man; Kathryn K Collins; Matthew Dare; Kenneth Fetterly; John D Fisher; Richard Hongo; Samuel Irefin; John Lopez; John M Miller; James C Perry; David J Slotwiner; Gery F Tomassoni; Esther Weiss
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 4.  Ethics of practicing medical procedures on newly dead and nearly dead patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Berger; Fred Rosner; Eric J Cassell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Teaching endotracheal intubation on the recently deceased: opinion of patients and families.

Authors:  Azim Mirzazadeh; Nima Ostadrahimi; Seyedeh Mojgan Ghalandarpoorattar; Fariba Asghari
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2014-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.