Literature DB >> 7815628

Testicular growth after successful varicocele correction in adolescents: comparison of artery sparing techniques with the Palomo procedure.

O Atassi1, E J Kass, B W Steinert.   

Abstract

Testicular growth after varicocele surgery was evaluated in 116 boys 9 to 20 years old. A total of 88 boys was available for followup testicular examination 3 to 60 months after successful varicocele repair (mean 25). Left testicular volume loss of 2 cc or greater was present preoperatively in 72 of the 88 patients. The Palomo procedure was performed in 36 cases and repair using artery sparing techniques was done in 36. Mean relative left testicular volume increased 18% in the artery sparing group and 21% in the Palomo group. The increase in relative testicular volume compared to preoperative volumes was statistically significant in both groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in testicular growth between the groups and no postoperative testicular atrophy was observed. A comparison group of 8 boys with uncorrected varicoceles demonstrated a mean relative volume increase of 3% (mean followup 22 months). The increase in testis volume in successfully corrected cases was statistically different (p < 0.05) from that of uncorrected cases. We conclude that reversal of varix induced testicular growth failure occurs only after successful surgical correction. The Palomo procedure resulted in equivalent testicular growth compared to the artery sparing techniques with fewer complications and no testicular atrophy despite intentional ligation of the testicular artery. Based on our data, we believe that the Palomo procedure should be the procedure of choice for adolescent varicocele correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7815628     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199502000-00065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  Lymphatic sparing, laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a new surgical technique.

Authors:  H L Tan; B Tecson; M Z Ee; J Tantoco
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Current management of adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  D A Paduch; S J Skoog
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2001

3.  Evaluation of testicular catch-up growth in adolescent microsurgical varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Fevzi Bedir; Ercüment Keskin; Mehmet Karabakan; İbrahim Karabulut; Fatih Kürşat Yılmazel; Ertuğrul Gazi Özbey; Yılmaz Aksoy; İsa Özbey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

Review 4.  The hemodynamic approach to evaluating adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Marco Castagnetti; Ignazio Gattuccio; Marco Pensabene; Maria Sergio; Enrico De Grazia
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Semen analysis in patients treated for varicocele in pediatric age: are surgical outcomes enough to preserve the fertility potential?

Authors:  Nicola Zampieri; Francesco Saverio Camoglio
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2018-06-15

6.  Scarless laparoscopic varicocelectomy using percutaneous intruments.

Authors:  Nicola Zampieri
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2020-08-15

Review 7.  Current Issues in Adolescent Varicocele: Pediatric Urological Perspectives.

Authors:  Jae Min Chung; Sang Don Lee
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 5.400

8.  Ipsilateral testicular catch-up growth rate following microsurgical inguinal adolescent varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Orhun Sinanoglu; Seyit Erkan Eyyupoglu; Sinan Ekici
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-07-31

Review 9.  The adolescent varicocele: treatment and outcome.

Authors:  Evan J Kass
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.862

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.