Literature DB >> 7815222

Somatosensory evoked potentials for prediction of outcome in acute severe brain injury.

J Beca1, P N Cox, M J Taylor, D Bohn, W Butt, W J Logan, J T Rutka.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) as a predictor of outcome in acute, severe brain injury, and to compare this with the predictive power of the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale score and computed tomographic scan. Outcome was measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale at a minimum of 6 months after injury. We studied 109 patients (aged 0.1 to 16.8 years) with SEPs within 4 days of the onset of coma. Four patients had absent SEPs and a favorable outcome by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (full recovery or moderate disability); two of these patients had meningitis with bilateral subdural effusions, one had a midbrain hemorrhage, and one had a decompressive craniectomy for uncontrolled intracranial hypertension. Normal SEPs had a positive predictive value for favorable outcome of 93% (95% confidence interval (CI), 77% to 99%), and absent SEPs had a positive predictive value for unfavorable outcome by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (severe disability, survival in a persistent vegetative state, or death) of 92% (95% CI, 80% to 98%). If the above identifiable clinical situations in which a physical barrier existed to impede cutaneous reception of the electrical impulse were excluded, the positive predictive value of absent SEPs for poor outcome reached 100% (95% CI, 92% to 100%). An absent motor response to painful stimulus also had 100% positive predictive value (95% CI, 84% to 100%) for unfavorable outcome; however, 23% of patients could not be evaluated because of the effects of muscle relaxants or sedatives. In patients with traumatic brain injury, results of computed tomography did not reliably predict outcome. Of the 59 patients with unfavorable outcome, 76% could be identified with SEPs compared with 36% with examination of motor function. We suggest that SEPs be performed in children with acute severe brain injury because they add an important tool to the physician's prognostic armamentarium. We conclude that in the absence of the above mentioned identifiable clinical situations, absent SEPs predict 100% unfavorable outcome, and this finding may warrant consideration of withdrawal of treatment in children with brain injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7815222     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70498-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  12 in total

1.  Withdrawal of medical treatment in children.

Authors:  A E Tournay
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Outcome prediction by motor and pupillary responses in children treated with therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Nicholas S Abend; Alexis A Topjian; Sudha Kilaru Kessler; Ana M Gutierrez-Colina; Robert A Berg; Vinay Nadkarni; Dennis J Dlugos; Robert R Clancy; Rebecca N Ichord
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.624

4.  Somatosensory evoked potentials in children with severe head trauma.

Authors:  Johannes Schalamon; Georg Singer; Senta Kurschel; Michael E Höllwarth
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Somatosensory evoked potentials after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Allison Bethune; Nadia Scantlebury; Ekaterina Potapova; Nicole Dinn; Victor Yang; Todd Mainprize; Mahmood Fazl; Farhad Pirouzmand; Leodante da Costa; Martin Chapman; Nicolas Phan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  A Critical Review for Developing Accurate and Dynamic Predictive Models Using Machine Learning Methods in Medicine and Health Care.

Authors:  Hamdan O Alanazi; Abdul Hanan Abdullah; Kashif Naseer Qureshi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 7.  Prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potentials in comatose children: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Riccardo Carrai; Antonello Grippo; Silvia Lori; Francesco Pinto; Aldo Amantini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  A prospective study of outcome predictors after severe brain injury in children.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  [Coma. The prognostic value of evoked potentials in patients after traumatic brain injury].

Authors:  M H Morgalla; J Bauer; R Ritz; M Tatagiba
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Phase synchronization in electroencephalographic recordings prognosticates outcome in paediatric coma.

Authors:  Vera Nenadovic; Jose Luis Perez Velazquez; James Saunders Hutchison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.