Literature DB >> 7814704

Antimutagenicity of fermented milk.

S R Nadathur1, S J Gould, A T Bakalinsky.   

Abstract

Reconstituted nonfat dry milk was fermented by Lactobacillus helveticus CH65, Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4, Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus CH3, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus 191R, and by a mixture of the latter two organisms. The fermented milks were then freeze-dried, extracted in acetone, dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide, and assayed for antimutagenicity in the Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium TA 100) against N-methyl, N'-nitro, N-nitroso-guanidine, and 3,2'-dimethyl-4-amino-biphenyl. Dose-dependent activity was significant against both mutagens in all extracts. Maximal inhibitory activity against 3,2'-dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl and N-methyl, N'-nitro, N-nitroso-guanidine was 2- and 2.7-fold greater, respectively, than that exhibited by extracts of unfermented milk. Extracts of milk fermented by L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus 191R were examined further. Compounds that were responsible for activity against both mutagens were less soluble in aqueous solutions than in dimethylsulfoxide. Adjustment of milk fermented by L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus 191R to pH 3, 7.6, or 13 prior to freeze-drying and acetone extraction did not significantly alter the activity specific for 3,2'-dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl. In contrast, compounds with activity specific for N-methyl, N'-nitro, N-nitrosoguanidine were less extractable at pH 7.6. The weak antimutagenicity of unfermented milk was not increased by addition of 2% L-lactic acid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7814704     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77269-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  3 in total

1.  Antimutagenicity of milk fermented by Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  A Belicová; J Krajcovic; J Dobias; L Ebringer
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 2.  Antimutagenic Activity as a Criterion of Potential Probiotic Properties.

Authors:  Evgeniya V Prazdnova; Maria S Mazanko; Vladimir A Chistyakov; Anna A Bogdanova; Aleksandr G Refeld; Evgeniya Y Kharchenko; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 3.  An Update on the Effectiveness of Probiotics in the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer.

Authors:  Vidya Sankarapandian; Balu Alagar Venmathi Maran; Ramya Lakshmi Rajendran; Manasi P Jogalekar; Sridharan Gurunagarajan; Rajapandiyan Krishnamoorthy; Prakash Gangadaran; Byeong-Cheol Ahn
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.