Literature DB >> 7813656

Spontaneous recognition of object configurations in rats: effects of fornix lesions.

A Ennaceur1, J P Aggleton.   

Abstract

The effects of fornix lesions were examined in an object recognition memory test based on spontaneous exploration. In the standard condition an object (A) was presented in the sample phase and then presented again in the test phase alongside a new object (B). Both fornix-transected (Fx) and control (Co) rats spent more time exploring the new object than the familiar object after retention delays of 1 min and 15 min. In two configural conditions designed to test sensitivity to reconfigured stimuli, the original sample (A) was now either re-presented alongside its rearranged version ([symbol: see text]) or, the re-arranged version itself ([symbol: see text]) was presented with a new object (B). In the first configural condition, both the Co and Fx rats spent more time exploring the reconfigured sample ([symbol: see text]) than the original version of the sample (A) following a delay of 1 min, but not 15 min. In the second configural condition, both Co and Fx rats spent more time exploring the new object (B) than the reconfigured version of the sample ([symbol: see text]) following a delay of 15 min but not 1 min. These present results do not support Sutherland and Rudy's hypothesis on hippocampal function; however, they demonstrate that memory of objects as well as memory of reconfigured objects could easily be examined in a test based on spontaneous exploratory behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7813656     DOI: 10.1007/bf00227281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

Review 1.  Forgetting of stimulus attributes: methodological implications for assessing associative phenomena.

Authors:  D C Riccio; J Ackil; A Burch-Vernon
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Multiple memory systems: what and why.

Authors:  L Nadel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Acquisition and retention by hippocampal rats of simple, conditional, and configural tasks using tactile and olfactory cues: implications for hippocampal function.

Authors:  I Q Whishaw; J A Tomie
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Damage to the hippocampal formation in rats selectively impairs the ability to learn cue relationships.

Authors:  R J Sutherland; R J McDonald; C R Hill; J W Rudy
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1989-11

5.  A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data.

Authors:  A Ennaceur; J Delacour
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1988-11-01       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Role of the parahippocampal region in spatial and non-spatial memory: effects of parahippocampal lesions on rewarded alternation and concurrent object discrimination learning in the rat.

Authors:  L A Rothblat; N Vnek; T C Gleason; L F Kromer
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1993-05-31       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairment in rats with hippocampal damage.

Authors:  M Gallagher; P C Holland
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. III. Spatial vs. non-spatial working memory.

Authors:  A Ennaceur; K Meliani
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1992-10-31       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex lesions in rats impair the acquisition and retention of a tactile-olfactory configural task.

Authors:  I Q Whishaw; J A Tomie; B Kolb
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  The effects of hippocampal lesions upon spatial and non-spatial tests of working memory.

Authors:  J P Aggleton; P R Hunt; J N Rawlins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  27 in total

1.  Object recognition as a measure of memory in 1-2 years old transgenic minipigs carrying the APPsw mutation for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Lene Vammen Søndergaard; Jan Ladewig; Frederik Dagnæs-Hansen; Mette S Herskin; Ida Elisabeth Holm
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  On the role of hippocampal protein synthesis in the consolidation and reconsolidation of object recognition memory.

Authors:  Janine I Rossato; Lia R M Bevilaqua; Jociane C Myskiw; Jorge H Medina; Iván Izquierdo; Martín Cammarota
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007 January-February       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 3.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt an associative mismatch process.

Authors:  R C Honey; A Watt; M Good
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The evolving role of dendritic spines and memory: Interaction(s) with estradiol.

Authors:  Maya Frankfurt; Victoria Luine
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  The influence of context on recognition memory in monkeys: effects of hippocampal, parahippocampal and perirhinal lesions.

Authors:  Jocelyne Bachevalier; Sarah Nemanic; Maria C Alvarado
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Impaired recognition memory in rats after damage to the hippocampus.

Authors:  R E Clark; S M Zola; L R Squire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Effects of long-term memantine on memory and neuropathology in Ts65Dn mice, a model for Down syndrome.

Authors:  Jason Lockrow; Heather Boger; Heather Bimonte-Nelson; Ann-Charlotte Granholm
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Intranasal Delivery of a Caspase-1 Inhibitor in the Treatment of Global Cerebral Ischemia.

Authors:  Ningjun Zhao; Xiaoying Zhuo; Yujiao Lu; Yan Dong; Mohammad Ejaz Ahmed; Donovan Tucker; Erin L Scott; Quanguang Zhang
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 5.590

9.  Lesions of the rat perirhinal cortex spare the acquisition of a complex configural visual discrimination yet impair object recognition.

Authors:  John P Aggleton; Mathieu M Albasser; Duncan J Aggleton; Guillaume L Poirier; John M Pearce
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 10.  Interactions between estradiol, BDNF and dendritic spines in promoting memory.

Authors:  V Luine; M Frankfurt
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.