Literature DB >> 7813335

Recall of informed consent after endoscopic procedures.

A B Elfant1, C Korn, L Mendez, M J Pello, S R Peikin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine if recall of informed consent is affected by the timing of obtaining informed consent before endoscopic procedures.
METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled for colonoscopy or esophagogastroduodenoscopy were enrolled in this prospective, randomized study. Each patient received informed consent 24 to 72 hours or immediately before the procedure, and follow-up occurred one to three days postprocedure.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in recall of informed consent or the individual elements of informed consent (indication, risks, benefits, alternatives) between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Recall of informed consent is similar whether consent is obtained immediately or several days before endoscopic procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7813335     DOI: 10.1007/bf02053848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  6 in total

1.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy.

Authors:  David Armstrong; Alan Barkun; Ron Bridges; Rose Carter; Chris de Gara; Catherine Dube; Robert Enns; Roger Hollingworth; Donald Macintosh; Mark Borgaonkar; Sylviane Forget; Grigorios Leontiadis; Jonathan Meddings; Peter Cotton; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Parental recall of anesthesia information: informing the practice of informed consent.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Virginia Gauger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Issues of consent in colonoscopy: if a patient says 'stop' should we continue?

Authors:  B Ward; S Shah; P Kirwan; J F Mayberry
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Patient perceptions and recall of consent for regional anaesthesia compared with consent for surgery.

Authors:  Roxaneh Zarnegar; Matthew R D Brown; Matthew Henley; Victoria Tidman; Ahilan Pathmanathan
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Clinical outcomes associated with attempts to educate patients about lower endoscopy: a narrative review.

Authors:  John M Coombes; John F Steiner; David B Bekelman; Allan V Prochazka; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-06

6.  Postoperative laparoscopic bariatric surgery patients do not remember potential complications.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; David S Tichansky; Raymond J Taddeucci
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.129

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.