Literature DB >> 7812670

Individual differences in mental imagery experience: developmental changes and specialization.

A R Isaac1, D F Marks.   

Abstract

This research has two purposes: (1) to study developmental changes and differences in visual and movement imagery in male and female children and adults; (2) to investigate whether systematic differences in imagery vividness can be measured in specialist groups. In Study 1, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire and the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire were administered to 547 individuals in age groups from 7-8 to 50+ years of age. Significant increases in imagery vividness were found in females at 8-9 and in males at 10-11 years. In general females report more vivid imagery than males but at about 50 females' movement imagery reduced in vividness. In Studies 2-5 imagery differences in specialist groups were examined using the same two questionnaires with a total of 655 participants. In Study 2, children aged 7-15 years with poor movement control were found to be extremely poor imagers with 42 per cent reporting no imagery at all. In Study 3, physical education students reported more vivid imagery than students specializing in physics, English, and surveying. In Study 4, significant differences were found between elite athletes' imagery and that of matched controls. In Study 5, air traffic controllers and pilots were found to have significantly more vivid imagery than matched control groups. Introspective reports of imagery experience show a systematic pattern of relationships with age, gender, and specialization requiring high-level performance of perceptual motor skills. These findings support the theory that mental imagery plays a key role in the planning and implementation of action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7812670     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02536.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  29 in total

1.  Thinking About Better Speech: Mental Practice for Stroke-Induced Motor Speech Impairments.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Stacy Harnish
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.773

2.  The influence of individual motor imagery ability on cerebral recruitment during gait imagery.

Authors:  Marian van der Meulen; Gilles Allali; Sebastian W Rieger; Frédéric Assal; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Towards a user-friendly brain-computer interface: initial tests in ALS and PLS patients.

Authors:  Ou Bai; Peter Lin; Dandan Huang; Ding-Yu Fei; Mary Kay Floeter
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Corticospinal facilitation during first and third person imagery.

Authors:  Alissa D Fourkas; Alessio Avenanti; Cosimo Urgesi; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Older Adults with Fear of Falling Show Deficits in Motor Imagery of Gait.

Authors:  R Sakurai; Y Fujiwara; M Yasunaga; H Suzuki; N Sakuma; K Imanaka; M Montero-Odasso
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

6.  Mental practice with motor imagery: evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Andrew J Butler; Stephen J Page
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Looking into the mind's eye: Directed and evaluated imagery vividness modulates imagery-perception congruency effects.

Authors:  Brett A Cochrane; Vanessa Ng; Anisha Khosla; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-14

8.  No sex differences in the TAMI.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-12-06

Review 9.  Assessing mental imagery in clinical psychology: a review of imagery measures and a guiding framework.

Authors:  David G Pearson; Catherine Deeprose; Sophie M A Wallace-Hadrill; Stephanie Burnett Heyes; Emily A Holmes
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-09-11

10.  An emerging paradigm: a strength-based approach to exploring mental imagery.

Authors:  Tadhg E Macintyre; Aidan P Moran; Christian Collet; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.