Literature DB >> 7812178

ERP amplitude and scalp distribution to target and novel events: effects of temporal order in young, middle-aged and older adults.

D Friedman1, G V Simpson.   

Abstract

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from young (mean age = 24.1), middle-aged (48.7) and older (69.7) adults during a version of the oddball paradigm, in which 48 unique, unexpected novel stimuli were interspersed with equally rare instructed targets. As older relative to younger adults are thought to differ in their ability to inhibit the processing of task irrelevant information, we expected, based on previous work, that novel stimuli would retain their 'novelty' longer in older than in younger adults. To assess this, P3 amplitude and scalp topography elicited by novels and targets were analyzed as a function of stimulus number (n = 6) within the block and as a function of block number (n = 4). The results were in line with the prediction: While the younger adults' P3 scalp distribution shifted from a relatively more frontal to a relatively more posterior focus as a function of novel number within the block, this was not evident in the scalp topographies of the older adults. Coupled with the older adults' elevated false alarm rates to novel stimuli, the data are consistent with a change in frontal lobe function with increases in age.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7812178     DOI: 10.1016/0926-6410(94)90020-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  27 in total

1.  Reproducibility of the hemodynamic response to auditory oddball stimuli: a six-week test-retest study.

Authors:  Kent A Kiehl; Peter F Liddle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Event-related brain potential changes after Choto-san administration in stroke patients with mild cognitive impairments.

Authors:  Shuhei Yamaguchi; Miwa Matsubara; Shotai Kobayashi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Altered prefrontal function with aging: insights into age-associated performance decline.

Authors:  Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Galit Fuhrmann Alpert; Ansgar J Furst; Laura A Hale; Tatsuhide Oga; Sundari Chetty; Natasha Pickard; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Brain responses to repeated visual experience among low and high sensation seekers: role of boredom susceptibility.

Authors:  Yang Jiang; Joann Lianekhammy; Adam Lawson; Chunyan Guo; Donald Lynam; Jane E Joseph; Brian T Gold; Thomas H Kelly
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  The brain's orienting response: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.

Authors:  David Friedman; Robin Goldman; Yaakov Stern; Truman R Brown
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Does the age-related "anterior shift" of the P3 reflect an inability to habituate the novelty response?

Authors:  Brittany R Alperin; Katherine K Mott; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Atypical brain response to novelty in rural African children with a history of severe falciparum malaria.

Authors:  Michael Kihara; Michelle de Haan; Harrun H Garrashi; Brian G R Neville; Charles R J C Newton
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 3.181

9.  Novelty P3 reductions in depression: characterization using principal components analysis (PCA) of current source density (CSD) waveforms.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser; Jonathan W Stewart; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Auditory and visual novelty processing in normally-developing Kenyan children.

Authors:  Michael Kihara; Alexandra M Hogan; Charles R Newton; Harrun H Garrashi; Brian R Neville; Michelle de Haan
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.