Literature DB >> 7812073

The variable incidence of hip fracture in southern Europe: the MEDOS Study.

I Elffors1, E Allander, J A Kanis, B Gullberg, O Johnell, J Dequeker, G Dilsen, C Gennari, A A Lopes Vaz, G Lyritis.   

Abstract

We assessed the incidence of hip fracture and ecological correlates in residents of 14 communities in six countries of Southern Europe. Hip fracture cases were recorded prospectively in defined catchment areas over a 1-year interval. A retrospective questionnaire was used to assess ecological differences between communities. During a 1-year period of observation a total of 3629 men and women over the age of 50 years were identified with hip fracture from a catchment of 3 million. In all communities the fracture rate increased exponentially with age. There were large and significant differences between centres in the doubling time for hip fracture risk with age and in crude and age-standardized rates. Greater than 4-fold and 13-fold differences in age-standardized risk were found amongst men and women respectively. The lowest rates were observed from Turkey and the highest from Seville, Crete and Porto. Fractures were significantly more frequent among women than men with the exception of three rural Turkish centres. Indeed, in rural Turkey the normal female/male ratio was reserved. Variations in incidence between regions were greater than the differences within centres between sexes, and there was a close and significant correlation between incidence rates for men and those for women in the regions studied. Excess female morbidity increased progressively from the age of 50 years but attained a plateau after the age of 80 years, suggesting a finite duration of the effect of the menopause. The retrospective questionnaire completed by 80% of cases suggested that differences in incidence between the communities studied could not be explained by differences in gonadal status in women. In both men and women cross-cultural associations were found with factors related to age or socioeconomic prosperity, the majority of which disappeared after adjustment for age. We conclude that there are marked and sizeable differences in the incidence rates of hip fracture throughout Southern Europe. The reasons for these differences are not known but affect both men and women, and are likely to be related to lifestyle or genetic factors rather than to differences in endocrine status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7812073     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  43 in total

1.  Bone-density measurement.

Authors:  J C Stevenson; J A Kanis; C Christiansen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Increasing age-adjusted risk of fragility fractures: a sign of increasing osteoporosis in successive generations?

Authors:  K J Obrant; U Bengnér; O Johnell; B E Nilsson; I Sernbo
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Osteoporosis and fracture of the femoral neck in the South African Bantu.

Authors:  L Solomon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1968-02

4.  Methodology of MEDOS multicentre study of hip fracture incidence: validity and relevance considerations.

Authors:  L Elffors; B Gullberg; E Allander; O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  The Mediterranean Osteoporosis (MEDOS) Study questionnaire.

Authors:  J Dequeker; J Ranstam; J Valsson; B Sigurgevisson; E Allander
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Fracture of neck of the femur: changing incidence.

Authors:  A F Lewis
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-11-07

7.  The apparent incidence of hip fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources.

Authors:  O Johnell; B Gullberg; E Allander; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Evidence for efficacy of drugs affecting bone metabolism in preventing hip fracture.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; B Gullberg; E Allander; G Dilşen; C Gennari; A A Lopes Vaz; G P Lyritis; G Mazzuoli; L Miravet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-07

9.  Rising incidence of fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  W J Boyce; M P Vessey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Fractured neck of femur. Prevention and management. Summary and recommendations of a report of the Royal College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1989-01
View more
  73 in total

Review 1.  An update on the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  The burden of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene incorporating the FRAX® algorithm in a European perspective.

Authors:  F Borgström; O Ström; M Kleman; E McCloskey; H Johansson; A Odén; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Discrepancies between hip BMD and fracture rate in Turkey: a familiar problem.

Authors:  S Tüzün; I Karacan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  International variation in proximal femur bone mineral density.

Authors:  M A Paggiosi; C C Glueer; C Roux; D M Reid; D Felsenberg; R Barkmann; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Influence of age and body mass on the effects of vitamin D on hip fracture risk.

Authors:  J Ranstam; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  The perspective of the International Osteoporosis Foundation on the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Ego Seeman; Olof Johnell; Rene Rizzoli; Pierre Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  The epidemiology of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael A Clynes; Nicholas C Harvey; Elizabeth M Curtis; Nicholas R Fuggle; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.291

9.  Latitude, socioeconomic prosperity, mobile phones and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  O Johnell; F Borgstrom; B Jonsson; J Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Epidemiology of hip and wrist fractures in Cameroon, Africa.

Authors:  Roger Martin Djoumessi Zebaze; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.