Literature DB >> 7810350

Towards a perspective theory of decision making and judgment.

H Montgomery1.   

Abstract

The notion of perspectives in its literal perceptual sense is assumed to shed light on thinking in general and evaluative processes in decision making and judgments in particular. Three determinants of perspectives in thinking are identified: (a) the subject, i.e., subject orientation, (b) the object, and (c) psychological distance between subject and object. Dependent on the congruence between subject orientation and characteristics of the object different figure-ground relationships are formed. When an inside perspective is adopted (the object is seen as affiliated with the subject) positive features form the ground and negative features are in the background. Conversely, when an outside perspective is adopted (the object is seen as separate from the subject) negative features form the figure and positive features are in the background. A model is outlined for relationships among perspectives, evaluations and external constraints in decision making and judgment. Empirical data from three empirical studies illustrate the validity of the framework described in the paper.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7810350     DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(94)90049-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  6 in total

1.  A decision aid for men with early stage prostate cancer: theoretical basis and a test by surrogate patients.

Authors:  D Feldman-Stewart; M D Brundage; L Van Manen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Patient-focussed decision-making in early-stage prostate cancer: insights from a cognitively based decision aid.

Authors:  Deb Feldman-Stewart; Michael D Brundage; Lori Van Manen; Ola Svenson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  GPs' decisions on drug treatment for patients with high cholesterol values: a think-aloud study.

Authors:  Lars Backlund; Ylva Skånér; Henry Montgomery; Johan Bring; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Imagine-Self Perspective-Taking and Rational Self-Interested Behavior in a Simple Experimental Normal-Form Game.

Authors:  Adam Karbowski; Michał Ramsza
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 5.  Providing information about options in patient decision aids.

Authors:  Deb Feldman-Stewart; Mary Ann O'Brien; Marla L Clayman; B Joyce Davison; Masahito Jimbo; Michel Labrecque; Richard W Martin; Heather Shepherd
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  What You Find Depends on How You Measure It: Reactivity of Response Scales Measuring Predecisional Information Distortion in Medical Diagnosis.

Authors:  Martine Nurek; Olga Kostopoulou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.