STUDY DESIGN: Forty-eight patients who underwent posterior decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis were studied. The effect of bone re-growth after posterior decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis on clinical outcome and the factors promoting the bone re-growth were investigated with a multivariate analysis model. METHODS: Bone re-growth at the sites operated upon was evaluated as a percentage of re-growth of the original laminectomy site based upon plain radiographs. The degree of bone re-growth was classified into four groups: 1) no significant re-growth (Group I, bone regrowth rate 10% or less); mild (Group II, 11% to 40%), moderate (Group III, 41% to 70%), and marked (Group IV, 71% to 100%). The average follow-up period was 4.5 years (range, 2 to 7 years). RESULTS: No significant bone re-growth was shown in 6% of the patients. Mild re-growth was shown in 50%, moderate re-growth in 29%, and marked re-growth in 15%. A multivariate analysis indicated that a total block in the preoperative myelogram, a follow-up period of more than 5 years, decompression at more than three spinal levels, and age under 60 years were associated with moderate or marked bone re-growth. Spinal instability accelerated the bone re-growth mainly in the mid and later follow-up intervals. Spinal levels adjacent to a fusion showed more bone re-growth. Patients with moderate and marked bone re-growth had poorer clinical outcomes than those with no significant and mild bone re-growth. CONCLUSION: Bone re-growth in a surgical defect will occur in most patients after posterior decompression. Moderate and marked postoperative bone re-growth are possibly related to recurrence of neurologic symptoms in the middle of and later on in follow-up periods.
STUDY DESIGN: Forty-eight patients who underwent posterior decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis were studied. The effect of bone re-growth after posterior decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis on clinical outcome and the factors promoting the bone re-growth were investigated with a multivariate analysis model. METHODS: Bone re-growth at the sites operated upon was evaluated as a percentage of re-growth of the original laminectomy site based upon plain radiographs. The degree of bone re-growth was classified into four groups: 1) no significant re-growth (Group I, bone regrowth rate 10% or less); mild (Group II, 11% to 40%), moderate (Group III, 41% to 70%), and marked (Group IV, 71% to 100%). The average follow-up period was 4.5 years (range, 2 to 7 years). RESULTS: No significant bone re-growth was shown in 6% of the patients. Mild re-growth was shown in 50%, moderate re-growth in 29%, and marked re-growth in 15%. A multivariate analysis indicated that a total block in the preoperative myelogram, a follow-up period of more than 5 years, decompression at more than three spinal levels, and age under 60 years were associated with moderate or marked bone re-growth. Spinal instability accelerated the bone re-growth mainly in the mid and later follow-up intervals. Spinal levels adjacent to a fusion showed more bone re-growth. Patients with moderate and marked bone re-growth had poorer clinical outcomes than those with no significant and mild bone re-growth. CONCLUSION: Bone re-growth in a surgical defect will occur in most patients after posterior decompression. Moderate and marked postoperative bone re-growth are possibly related to recurrence of neurologic symptoms in the middle of and later on in follow-up periods.