Literature DB >> 7808281

The effect of retrieval enactment on recall of subject-performed tasks and verbal tasks.

R Kormi-Nouri1, L Nyberg, L G Nilsson.   

Abstract

The effect of retrieval enactment on memory for nouns (objects) or verbal phrases describing simple actions (e.g., "lift the box") was addressed in two experiments. In Experiment 1, the type of object involved in the actions was manipulated, with three different types of object being used (body parts, laboratory-related objects, and external objects). In Experiment 2, the integration between the verb-noun pairs was manipulated (well-integrated vs. poorly integrated). Results from both experiments showed that whereas encoding enactment (motor encoding and verbal test) substantially improved the memory performance compared with a verbal condition (verbal encoding and verbal test), retrieval enactment (verbal encoding and motor test) had no major impact on the number of recalled nouns or phrases. Moreover, there was no additional effect of dual enactment (motor encoding and motor test). The overall pattern of the results suggests that there is a fundamental difference between motor processing at encoding and motor processing at retrieval, and the lack of encoding specificity advantage for the motor modality contradicts the view that encoding enactment of verbal commands results in storage of motor representations.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7808281     DOI: 10.3758/bf03209257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  4 in total

1.  Activity memory and aging: the role of motor retrieval and strategic processing.

Authors:  M P Norris; R L West
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1993-03

2.  Age differences in memory for prospective compared with retrospective subject-performed tasks.

Authors:  B M Brooks; J M Gardiner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-01

3.  Motor programme information as a separable memory unit.

Authors:  J Engelkamp; H D Zimmer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1984

4.  Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance.

Authors:  L Bäckman; L G Nilsson
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.645

  4 in total
  12 in total

1.  Memory effects of motor activation in subject-performed tasks and sign language.

Authors:  Jan D von Essen; Lars-Göran Nilsson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

2.  Signing enhances memory like performing actions.

Authors:  Hubert D Zimmer; Johannes Engelkamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

3.  Memory for goal-directed sequences of actions: is doing better than seeing?

Authors:  Meianie C Steffens
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

4.  Spatial recall improved by retrieval enactment.

Authors:  Gregory V Jones; Maryanne Martin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

5.  Memory for actions: self-performed tasks and the reenactment effect.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Susan L Hornstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

6.  Enactment versus conceptual encoding: equivalent item memory but different source memory.

Authors:  Ava J Senkfor; Cyma Van Petten; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  The role of enactment in prospective remembering.

Authors:  E G Schaefer; M V Kozak; K Sagness
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

8.  The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory.

Authors:  R Kormi-Nouri; L G Nilsson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

9.  Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for performed tasks.

Authors:  J Engelkamp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-01

10.  Gesturing makes memories that last.

Authors:  Susan Wagner Cook; Terina Kuangyi Yip; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.