Literature DB >> 7807264

Setting occupational health standards: toxicokinetic differences among and between men and women.

T Silvaggio1, D R Mattison.   

Abstract

Differences between and among men, nonpregnant women, and pregnant women can influence exposure and response to workplace toxicants. These differences should be delineated, compared, and used when setting regulatory standards to protect workers from potentially hazardous workplace environments. Anatomical and physiological parameters include: body composition; surface area; blood, organ, and tissue volume; metabolism; and cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and renal structure and function. Although men differ among themselves, on average, they also differ from women by weighing more, being taller, and having a larger surface area. Total body water is 40% greater in men than nonpregnant women; however, during pregnancy, body water increases from 29 to 33 liters. Extracellular and intracellular water volumes are smallest in nonpregnant women, increase with pregnancy, but remain smaller than those in men. Pulmonary function differs; pregnant women have the largest minute volume and greatest volume of air exchanged in an 8-hour period. This article compares anatomical, physiological, and toxicokinetic characteristics of men and nonpregnant and pregnant women to explore how differences in these factors contribute to variations in exposures, target tissue doses, and responses to workplace or environmental chemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7807264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med        ISSN: 0096-1736


  9 in total

1.  Occupational exposures are associated with worse morbidity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Laura M Paulin; Gregory B Diette; Paul D Blanc; Nirupama Putcha; Mark D Eisner; Richard E Kanner; Andrew J Belli; Stephanie Christenson; Donald P Tashkin; MeiLan Han; R Graham Barr; Nadia N Hansel
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Occupational exposure influences on gender differences in respiratory health.

Authors:  Helen Dimich-Ward; Kris Beking; Anne DyBuncio; Moira Chan-Yeung; Weiwei Du; Barbara Karlen; Pat G Camp; Susan M Kennedy
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 3.  Agricultural exposures and cancer.

Authors:  A Blair; S H Zahm
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Mortality among 24,865 workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in three electrical capacitor manufacturing plants: a ten-year update.

Authors:  Avima M Ruder; Misty J Hein; Nancy B Hopf; Martha A Waters
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 5.840

5.  Occupational physical activity and risk for cancer of the colon and rectum in Sweden among men and women by anatomic subsite.

Authors:  Tahereh Moradi; Gloria Gridley; Jan Björk; Mustafa Dosemeci; Bu-Tian Ji; Hans J Berkel; Stanley Lemeshow
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 6.  Sex differences in drug disposition.

Authors:  Offie P Soldin; Sarah H Chung; Donald R Mattison
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-02-23

Review 7.  Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Offie P Soldin; Donald R Mattison
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Occupational Exposures and Computed Tomographic Imaging Characteristics in the SPIROMICS Cohort.

Authors:  Laura M Paulin; Benjamin M Smith; Abby Koch; MeiLan Han; Eric A Hoffman; Carlos Martinez; Chinedu Ejike; Paul D Blanc; Jennifer Rous; R Graham Barr; Stephen P Peters; Robert Paine; Cheryl Pirozzi; Christopher B Cooper; Mark T Dransfield; Alejandro P Comellas; Richard E Kanner; M Brad Drummond; Nirupama Putcha; Nadia N Hansel
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2018-12

Review 9.  Women and occupational lung disease: sex differences and gender influences on research and disease outcomes.

Authors:  Patricia G Camp; Helen Dimich-Ward; Susan M Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.878

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.