Literature DB >> 7807104

Costs of elective total hip arthroplasty during the first year. Cemented versus noncemented.

A Laupacis1, R Bourne, C Rorabeck, D Feeny, C Wong, P Tugwell, K Leslie, R Bullas.   

Abstract

The cost-effectiveness of the Mallory Head (Biomet, Warsaw, IN) cemented versus noncemented total hip arthroplasty was determined as part of a randomized trial. Costs were assessed during the first postoperative year. In-hospital resource use was determined using a chart review of 60 randomly selected patients. Costs were determined using a fully allocated costing model. Outpatient resource use was determined using patient diaries, and appropriate costs were allocated for outpatient visits, admissions to hospital, and patient-borne costs. There was no difference in costs between the cemented and noncemented prostheses. The average cost of the initial hospitalization was $9,990 (1988 Canadian dollars), and outpatient costs during the first year were $1,137 (total cost during the first year was $11,127). The cost per quality adjusted life year was $27,139 during the first year and $8,031 during the first 3 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7807104     DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90093-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  19 in total

1.  Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: a prospective study.

Authors:  P Rissanen; S Aro; H Sintonen; P Slätis; P Paavolainen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Apostolos Dimitroulias; Michael P Bolognesi; Katherine L Hwang; Stuart B Goodman; Randall E Marcus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Assessing the value of a total joint replacement.

Authors:  David B Bumpass; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-12

Review 4.  Total hip arthroplasty: areview of advances, advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Xin-Wei Liu; Ying Zi; Liang-Bi Xiang; Yu Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

5.  The uncemented Bicontact total hip arthroplasty in octogenarians. Medium-term results.

Authors:  N P Badhe; R C Quinnell; P W Howard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2002-12-18

Review 6.  Patient self-reports in pharmacoeconomic studies. Their use and impact on study validity.

Authors:  C Evans; B Crawford
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Early discharge and home intervention reduces unit costs after total hip replacement: results of a cost analysis in a randomized study.

Authors:  Eyjolfur Sigurdsson; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Halldor Jonsson; Vilmundur Gudnason; Thorolfur Matthiasson; Brynjolfur Y Jonsson
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2008-06-21

8.  Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Christine M Pui; Matthew J Ludeman; Thomas P Vail; Marc D Silverstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Measuring tools for functional outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  The cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review of published literature.

Authors:  Meghan E Daigle; Alexander M Weinstein; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.098

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.