Literature DB >> 7806737

The Sessing scale for assessment of pressure ulcer healing.

B A Ferrell1, B M Artinian, D Sessing.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a new observational scale, the Sessing scale, for measuring the progression of pressure ulcers. CRITERION STANDARDS: Changes in Shea stage and the diameter of healing pressure ulcers.
SUBJECTS: A cohort of 84 nursing home residents with pressure ulcers.
RESULTS: There were strong relationships between changes in healing as measured by the Sessing Scale and those measured by the Shea Scale (Spearman's r = 0.90; P < .0001), and between changes in the Sessing scale compared with changes in ulcer diameter (Spearman's r = 0.64; P < .001). Test-retest reliability was good (Kappa = 0.84) in a sample of 50 subjects.
CONCLUSION: The Sessing scale is a simple, easy to use, observational instrument with validity and reliability for the assessment of progression of pressure ulcers in a clinical or research setting. Findings indicate that the Sessing scale, with its description of granulation tissue, infection, drainage, necrosis, and eschar, measures an important domain of wound healing that is independent and perhaps as important to clinicians and researchers as either Shea stage or ulcer size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7806737     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06239.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  4 in total

1.  Subepidermal moisture surrounding pressure ulcers in persons with a spinal cord injury: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jeffrey John Harrow; Harvey N Mayrovitz
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Wound bed preparation of difficult wounds: an evolution of the principles of TIME.

Authors:  Claudio Ligresti; Filippo Bo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  A reliable method of determining wound healing rate.

Authors:  D Cukjati; S Rebersek; D Miklavcic
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Comparison of standardized clinical evaluation of wounds using ruler length by width and Scout length by width measure and Scout perimeter trace.

Authors:  Diane Langemo; James Spahn; Thomas Spahn; V Chowdry Pinnamaneni
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.347

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.