| Literature DB >> 7806552 |
F L Buczek1, T M Kepple, K L Siegel, S J Stanhope.
Abstract
We hypothesized that defining joint power (JP) merely on the basis of joint rotations ignores important translational power terms, and may not adequately represent the energy flow profile for a given muscle group. A novel six degree-of-freedom (6 DOF) model of the ankle complex was implemented, accounting for previously ignored joint translations as well as traditional rotations. Foot and shank kinematic and kinetic data were collected over a stride cycle on five male and five female adults, walking five trials each at 0.69 statures s-1. During intra-subject analyses, ensemble averages were calculated (n = 5) for JP associated with each DOF, and for related velocity and force/moment data. Translational joint velocities typically peaked below 10% of the mean walking velocity. The largest peak in JP occurred for the rotational DOF associated with dorsi/plantar flexion (360 W). The next largest peak in JP was for the vertical translational DOF, and was nearly 10% of the predominant peak. Positive work during push-off was significantly less p < or = 0.05) for the 6 DOF model (27.9 J) than for either 1 or 3 DOF rotational models (30.3 and 29.9 J, respectively). Negative work during early stance was significantly less for the 6 DOF model (-10.3 J) than for either the 1 or 3 DOF models (-13.1 and -12.6 J, respectively). Inter-subject analyses (n = 50) were conducted for JP data only, with similar results. We conclude that translational JP terms are of practical importance in mechanical energy studies, and may be of particular concern when evaluating energy storing prostheses, when summing total power at several joints, and when studying pathologies that disturb joint geometry.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1994 PMID: 7806552 DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90194-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomech ISSN: 0021-9290 Impact factor: 2.712