Literature DB >> 7806552

Translational and rotational joint power terms in a six degree-of-freedom model of the normal ankle complex.

F L Buczek1, T M Kepple, K L Siegel, S J Stanhope.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that defining joint power (JP) merely on the basis of joint rotations ignores important translational power terms, and may not adequately represent the energy flow profile for a given muscle group. A novel six degree-of-freedom (6 DOF) model of the ankle complex was implemented, accounting for previously ignored joint translations as well as traditional rotations. Foot and shank kinematic and kinetic data were collected over a stride cycle on five male and five female adults, walking five trials each at 0.69 statures s-1. During intra-subject analyses, ensemble averages were calculated (n = 5) for JP associated with each DOF, and for related velocity and force/moment data. Translational joint velocities typically peaked below 10% of the mean walking velocity. The largest peak in JP occurred for the rotational DOF associated with dorsi/plantar flexion (360 W). The next largest peak in JP was for the vertical translational DOF, and was nearly 10% of the predominant peak. Positive work during push-off was significantly less p < or = 0.05) for the 6 DOF model (27.9 J) than for either 1 or 3 DOF rotational models (30.3 and 29.9 J, respectively). Negative work during early stance was significantly less for the 6 DOF model (-10.3 J) than for either the 1 or 3 DOF models (-13.1 and -12.6 J, respectively). Inter-subject analyses (n = 50) were conducted for JP data only, with similar results. We conclude that translational JP terms are of practical importance in mechanical energy studies, and may be of particular concern when evaluating energy storing prostheses, when summing total power at several joints, and when studying pathologies that disturb joint geometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7806552     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90194-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  12 in total

1.  Walking with added mass magnifies salient features of human foot energetics.

Authors:  Nikolaos Papachatzis; Philippe Malcolm; Carl A Nelson; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Soft Tissue Deformations Contribute to the Mechanics of Walking in Obese Adults.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Fu; Karl E Zelik; Wayne J Board; Raymond C Browning; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Which lower limb joints compensate for destabilizing energy during walking in humans?

Authors:  Pawel R Golyski; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.293

Review 4.  Ankle and foot power in gait analysis: Implications for science, technology and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Eric C Honert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Soft tissues store and return mechanical energy in human running.

Authors:  R C Riddick; A D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Effects of age and locomotor demand on foot mechanics during walking.

Authors:  Rebecca L Krupenevich; William H Clark; Samuel F Ray; Kota Z Takahashi; Howard E Kashefsky; Jason R Franz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Energy neutral: the human foot and ankle subsections combine to produce near zero net mechanical work during walking.

Authors:  Kota Z Takahashi; Kate Worster; Dustin A Bruening
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Intrinsic foot joints adapt a stabilized-resistive configuration during the stance phase.

Authors:  Paul-André Deleu; Laurence Chèze; Raphaël Dumas; Jean-Luc Besse; Thibaut Leemrijse; Bernhard Devos Bevernage; Ivan Birch; Alexandre Naaim
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Prosthetic energy return during walking increases after 3 weeks of adaptation to a new device.

Authors:  Samuel F Ray; Shane R Wurdeman; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  The effects of ankle stiffness on mechanics and energetics of walking with added loads: a prosthetic emulator study.

Authors:  Erica A Hedrick; Philippe Malcolm; Jason M Wilken; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.