Literature DB >> 7806033

Mechanism of colonic permeation of inulin: is rat colon more permeable than small intestine?

T Y Ma1, D Hollander, R A Erickson, H Truong, H Nguyen, P Krugliak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonic epithelium is considered to be relatively tight. The colonic "pore" diameter is 6 A; therefore, colonic epithelium has generally been considered to be impermeable to hydrophilic probes with a cross-sectional diameter of > 6 A. This study examined whether rat colon is permeable to inulin, a large hydrophilic macromolecule having a molecular weight of 5000 g/mol and a cross-sectional diameter of 15 A (hydration diameter, 20 A).
METHODS: The colonic permeation of inulin (10 mumol/L) in vivo was investigated by perfusion of rat colonic segments.
RESULTS: There was significant colonic permeation of inulin, but tissue retention of inulin was low. The net colonic flux of inulin was strongly dependent on net water flux, showing a strong solvent drag effect. Addition of 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 decreased water flux with a corresponding decrease in inulin flux; this process seemed to be mediated by 5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate because both the phosphodiesterase inhibitor aminophylline and dibutyryl adenosine 5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate decreased water and inulin flux in a parallel manner. Chenodeoxycholic and taurocholic acids decreased net mucosal-to-serosal water flux but increased inulin flux. The net colonic permeation rate of inulin was higher than the small intestinal permeation rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Rat colon is permeable to inulin. The higher net colonic permeability may be caused by differences in mucosal surface, permselectivity, solvent drag effect, and differences in net water fluxes of the colon and small intestine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7806033     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90003-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  6 in total

1.  Influence of morphometric factors on quantitation of paracellular permeability of intestinal epithelia in vitro.

Authors:  A Collett; D Walker; E Sims; Y L He; P Speers; J Ayrton; M Rowland; G Warhurst
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Comparison of cattle and sheep colonic permeabilities to horseradish peroxidase and hamster scrapie prion protein in vitro.

Authors:  A T McKie; P S Zammit; R J Naftalin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Effect of L-glutamine and n-butyrate on the restitution of rat colonic mucosa after acid induced injury.

Authors:  W Scheppach; G Dusel; T Kuhn; C Loges; H Karch; H P Bartram; F Richter; S U Christl; H Kasper
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Intestinal passive absorption of water-soluble compounds by sparrows: effect of molecular size and luminal nutrients.

Authors:  J G Chediack; E Caviedes-Vidal; V Fasulo; L J Yamin; W H Karasov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 5.  Does fluid flow across the intestinal mucosa affect quantitative oral drug absorption? Is it time for a reevaluation?

Authors:  H Lennernäs
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Self-Microemulsifying Drug Delivery System: Formulation and Study Intestinal Permeability of Ibuprofen in Rats.

Authors:  Bharat Bhushan Subudhi; Surjyanarayan Mandal
Journal:  J Pharm (Cairo)       Date:  2013-06-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.