Literature DB >> 7805707

Treatment of 150 ureteric calculi with the Lithoclast.

M Robert1, A Bennani, J Guiter, M Avérous, D Grasset.   

Abstract

From May 1992 to October 1993, 150 ureteral stones, impervious to piezoelectric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with ultrasound localization (EDAP LT.01), were treated with the Lithoclast. The maximum dimensions varied from 5 to 25 mm with a mean of 11 mm. 46 calculi were situated in the pelvic ureter, 82 in the abdominal ureter, and 22 were stuck in the ureteropelvic junction. There was no complete failure of fragmentation, but 39 abdominal calculi (48%) required additional treatment by ESWL due to migration of the fragments into the calyces. Apart from a few needle-sized perforations, ureteral tissue was not damaged by the Lithoclast. The use of this endoscopic lithotripter, which is highly efficient and painless, is, however, limited by the significant effect of retrograde propulsion of very mobile stones or fragments in the urinary tract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7805707     DOI: 10.1159/000475382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  8 in total

1.  Emergency ureteroscopic lithotripsy in acute renal colic caused by ureteral calculi: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mohammed A Al-Ghazo; Ibrahim Fathi Ghalayini; Rami S Al-Azab; Osamah Bani Hani; Ibrahim Bani-Hani; Mohammad Abuharfil; Yazan Haddad
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-04-17

2.  Dual usage of a stone basket: Stone capture and retropulsion prevention.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Daniela Ghiculete; Robert Sowerby; Michael Ordon; Jason Y Lee; Kenneth T Pace; John R Honey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Pneumatic versus laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a comparison of initial outcomes and cost.

Authors:  Aslan Demir; Mert Ali Karadağ; Kurşat Ceçen; Mehmet Uslu; Omer Erkam Arslan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mohamed Bastawisy; Tarek Gameel; Mohamed Radwan; Ahmed Ramadan; Mutie Alkathiri; Adel Omar
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-10

5.  Prevention of retrograde calculus migration with the Stone Cone.

Authors:  N P Pardalidis; A G Papatsoris; E V Kosmaoglou
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2004-12-30

6.  Use of NTrap® during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Upper Ureteral Stones.

Authors:  Moung Jin Lee; Seung Tae Lee; Seung Ki Min
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

7.  Safety and efficacy of using the stone cone and an entrapment and extraction device in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteric stones.

Authors:  Waleed Shabana; Mohamed Teleb; Tamer Dawod
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-03-09

8.  Damage of stone baskets by endourologic lithotripters: a laboratory study of 5 lithotripters and 4 basket types.

Authors:  Jens Cordes; Felix Nguyen; Birgit Lange; Ralf Brinkmann; Dieter Jocham
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2013-10-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.