Literature DB >> 780379

Curing and caring -- a proposed method for self-assessment in primary care organizations.

J R Howell, M Osterweis, R R Huntley.   

Abstract

Key research in the area of quality assessment is reviewed and a method for periodic assessment in primary care organizations is proposed. The suggested approach is designed for administrative, rather than research, purposes. Therefore, it focuses on indicators that are both practical and realistic for use in periodic monitoring. The proposed method is two-staged and includes both technical performance (curing) and satisfaction (caring). At the first level of evaluation, general areas of performance are examined; these are key performance indicators in prevention, diagnosis, and management of illness, and questionnaires dealing with the accessibility and acceptability of care, coupled with objective measures of satisfaction. Those areas of performance that are not up to management standards are then examined in greater detail at the second level of evaluation. Using this approach, organizations can build a longitudinal picture of performance and chart their progress annually.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 780379     DOI: 10.1007/bf01324585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  13 in total

1.  Dimensions of patient attitudes regarding doctors and medical care services.

Authors:  J E Ware; M K Snyder
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The state of the art of quality assessment--1973.

Authors:  C E Lewis
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Quality of medical care in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  M H Shortridge
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Scale for the measurement of attitudes toward physicians and primary medical care.

Authors:  B S Hulka; S J Zyzanski; J C Cassel; S J Thompson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1970 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Evaualtion of the performance of ambulatory care systems: research requirements and opportunities.

Authors:  D K Freeborn; M R Greenlick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1973 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Effectiveness of patient care in an emergency room.

Authors:  R H Brook; R L Stevenson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Evaluating quality of medical care in the neighborhood health center program of the Office of Economic Opportunity.

Authors:  M A Morehead
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1970 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Evaluating quality of patient care. A strategy relating outcome and process assessment.

Authors:  J W Williamson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1971-10-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The medical audit as an operational tool.

Authors:  M A Morehead
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1967-09

10.  Gaps in doctor-patient communication. Patients' response to medical advice.

Authors:  V Francis; B M Korsch; M J Morris
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1969-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Physician and patient assessment of ambulatory care in a University facility.

Authors:  S R Orden; P Collette; J Souchek; L Masover; J Stamler
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1978

2.  The Johns Hopkins ambulatory-care coding scheme.

Authors:  D M Steinwachs; A I Mushlin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Direct and indirect measures of patient satisfaction with physicians' services.

Authors:  M A Stewart; J Wanklin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1978

4.  Assessing technical performance at diverse ambulatory care sites.

Authors:  M Osterweis; E Bryant
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1978
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.